Urnov, F. D. et al. Extremely environment friendly endogenous human gene correction utilizing designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 435, 646–651 (2005).
Google Scholar
Perez, C. et al. Components affecting double-strand break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Biotechniques 39, 109–115 (2005).
Google Scholar
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, Ok. & Bradley, A. Restore of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 results in giant deletions and complicated rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).
Google Scholar
Haapaniemi, E., Botla, S., Persson, J., Schmierer, B. & Taipale, J. CRISPR–Cas9 genome modifying induces a p53-mediated DNA injury response. Nat. Med. 24, 927–930 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pabo, C. O., Peisach, E. & Grant, R. A. Design and choice of novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 313–340 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ichikawa, D. M. et al. A common deep-learning mannequin for zinc finger design allows transcription issue reprogramming. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1117–1129 (2023).
Google Scholar
Carroll, D. Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics 188, 773–782 (2011).
Google Scholar
Boch, J. et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 326, 1509–1512 (2009).
Google Scholar
Miller, J. C. et al. A TALE nuclease structure for environment friendly genome modifying. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 143–148 (2011).
Google Scholar
Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
Google Scholar
Akopian, A., He, J., Boocock, M. R. & Stark, W. M. Chimeric recombinases with designed DNA sequence recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8688–8691 (2003).
Google Scholar
Chaikind, B., Bessen, J. L., Thompson, D. B., Hu, J. H. & Liu, D. R. A programmable Cas9–serine recombinase fusion protein that operates on DNA sequences in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9758–9770 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gaj, T., Mercer, A. C., Sirk, S. J., Smith, H. L. & Barbas, C. F. third A complete method to zinc-finger recombinase customization allows genomic focusing on in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 3937–3946 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gordley, R. M., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. F. third Synthesis of programmable integrases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5053–5058 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mercer, A. C., Gaj, T., Fuller, R. P. & Barbas, C. F. third Chimeric TALE recombinases with programmable DNA sequence specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11163–11172 (2012).
Google Scholar
Prorocic, M. M. et al. Zinc-finger recombinase actions in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9316–9328 (2011).
Google Scholar
Standage-Beier, Ok. et al. RNA-guided recombinase–Cas9 fusion targets genomic DNA deletion and integration. CRISPR J. 2, 209–222 (2019).
Google Scholar
Voziyanova, E., Li, F., Shah, R. & Voziyanov, Y. Genome focusing on by hybrid Flp–TAL recombinases. Sci. Rep. 10, 17479 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mukhametzyanova, L. et al. Activation of recombinases at particular DNA loci by zinc-finger area insertions. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1844–1854 (2024).
Google Scholar
Feng, X., Bednarz, A. L. & Colloms, S. D. Exact focused integration by a chimaeric transposase zinc-finger fusion protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1204–1216 (2010).
Google Scholar
Owens, J. B. et al. Transcription activator like effector (TALE)-directed piggyBac transposition in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9197–9207 (2013).
Google Scholar
Owens, J. B. et al. Chimeric piggyBac transposases for genomic focusing on in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6978–6991 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. et al. TAL effectors mediate high-efficiency transposition of the piggyBac transposon in silkworm Bombyx mori L. Sci. Rep. 5, 17172 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yant, S. R., Huang, Y., Akache, B. & Kay, M. A. Web site-directed transposon integration in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e50 (2007).
Google Scholar
Klompe, S. E., Vo, P. L. H., Halpin-Healy, T. S. & Sternberg, S. H. Transposon-encoded CRISPR–Cas methods direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature 571, 219–225 (2019).
Google Scholar
Strecker, J. et al. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365, 48–53 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lampe, G. D. et al. Focused DNA integration in human cells with out double-strand breaks utilizing CRISPR-associated transposases. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 87–98 (2024).
Google Scholar
Witte, I. P. et al. Programmable gene insertion in human cells with a laboratory-evolved CRISPR-associated transposase. Science 388, eadt5199 (2025).
Google Scholar
Durrant, M. G. et al. Bridge RNAs direct programmable recombination of goal and donor DNA. Nature 630, 984–993 (2024).
Google Scholar
Merrick, C. A., Zhao, J. & Rosser, S. J. Serine integrases: advancing artificial biology. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 299–310 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bessen, J. L. et al. Excessive-resolution specificity profiling and off-target prediction for site-specific DNA recombinases. Nat. Commun. 10, 1937 (2019).
Google Scholar
Campbell, A. M. Chromosomal insertion websites for phages and plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 174, 7495–7499 (1992).
Google Scholar
Kim, A. I. et al. Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integrates into the Mycobacterium smegmatis groEL1 gene. Mol. Microbiol. 50, 463–473 (2003).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, P., Kim, A. I. & Hatfull, G. F. The orientation of mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integration is solely depending on the central dinucleotide of attP and attB. Mol. Cell 12, 1101–1111 (2003).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, P., Wasil, L. R. & Hatfull, G. F. Management of phage Bxb1 excision by a novel recombination directionality issue. PLoS Biol. 4, e186 (2006).
Google Scholar
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Programmable deletion, alternative, integration and inversion of enormous DNA sequences with twin prime modifying. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 731–740 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yarnall, M. T. N. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion of enormous sequences with out double-strand DNA cleavage utilizing CRISPR-directed integrases. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 500–512 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pandey, S. et al. Environment friendly site-specific integration of enormous genes in mammalian cells through constantly developed recombinases and prime modifying. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 22–39 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, P. et al. Rising intracellular dNTP ranges improves prime modifying effectivity. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 539–544 (2025).
Google Scholar
Xu, Z. et al. Accuracy and effectivity outline Bxb1 integrase as the most effective of fifteen candidate serine recombinases for the combination of DNA into the human genome. BMC Biotechnol. 13, 87 (2013).
Google Scholar
Rebar, E. J. & Pabo, C. O. Zinc finger phage: affinity choice of fingers with new DNA-binding specificities. Science 263, 671–673 (1994).
Google Scholar
Greisman, H. A. & Pabo, C. O. A normal technique for choosing high-affinity zinc finger proteins for numerous DNA goal websites. Science 275, 657–661 (1997).
Google Scholar
Karpinski, J. et al. Directed evolution of a recombinase that excises the provirus of most HIV-1 main isolates with excessive specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 401–409 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lansing, F. et al. Correction of an element VIII genomic inversion with designer-recombinases. Nat. Commun. 13, 422 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rutherford, Ok., Yuan, P., Perry, Ok., Sharp, R. & van Duyne, G. D. Attachment web site recognition and regulation of directionality by the serine integrases. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 8341–8356 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, H., Sharp, R., Rutherford, Ok., Gupta, Ok. & van Duyne, G. D. Serine integrase attP binding and specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4401–4418 (2018).
Google Scholar
Baek, M. et al. Correct prediction of protein constructions and interactions utilizing a three-track neural community. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gersbach, C. A., Gaj, T., Gordley, R. M. & Barbas, C. F. third Directed evolution of recombinase specificity by break up gene reassembly. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4198–4206 (2010).
Google Scholar
Pavletich, N. P. & Pabo, C. O. Zinc finger–DNA recognition: crystal construction of a Zif268–DNA advanced at 2.1 A. Science 252, 809–817 (1991).
Google Scholar
Zheng, Z. et al. Anchored multiplex PCR for focused next-generation sequencing. Nat. Med. 20, 1479–1484 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq allows genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015).
Google Scholar
Arellano-Carbajal, F. et al. Macoilin, a conserved nervous system-specific ER membrane protein that regulates neuronal excitability. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001341 (2011).
Google Scholar
McCorvie, T. J. et al. Molecular foundation for the regulation of human glycogen synthase by phosphorylation and glucose-6-phosphate. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 628–638 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kotin, R. M., Linden, R. M. & Berns, Ok. I. Characterization of a most well-liked web site on human chromosome 19q for integration of adeno-associated virus DNA by non-homologous recombination. EMBO J. 11, 5071–5078 (1992).
Google Scholar
Peng, J. et al. Dusty protein kinases: main construction, gene evolution, tissue particular expression and distinctive options of the catalytic area. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1759, 562–572 (2006).
Google Scholar
Roth, T. L. et al. Reprogramming human T cell perform and specificity with non-viral genome focusing on. Nature 559, 405–409 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hornung, V. & Latz, E. Intracellular DNA recognition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 123–130 (2010).
Google Scholar
Inniss, M. C. et al. A novel Bxb1 integrase RMCE system for prime constancy site-specific integration of mAb expression cassette in CHO cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114, 1837–1846 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Bxb1 integrase serves as a extremely environment friendly DNA recombinase in fast metabolite pathway meeting. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 49, 44–50 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thomson, J. G. et al. The Bxb1 recombination system demonstrates heritable transmission of site-specific excision in Arabidopsis. BMC Biotechnol. 12, 9 (2012).
Google Scholar
Blechl, A., Lin, J., Shao, M., Thilmony, R. & Thomson, J. The Bxb1 recombinase mediates site-specific deletion in transgenic wheat. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 30, 1357–1366 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jiang, L. et al. Goal strains for recombinase-mediated gene stacking in soybean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 135, 1163–1175 (2022).
Google Scholar
Durrant, M. G. et al. Systematic discovery of recombinases for environment friendly integration of enormous DNA sequences into the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 488–499 (2023).
Google Scholar
McCarty, D. M. et al. Adeno-associated virus terminal repeat (TR) mutant generates self-complementary vectors to beat the rate-limiting step to transduction in vivo. Gene Ther. 10, 2112–2118 (2003).
Google Scholar
Zhang, C. P. et al. Environment friendly non-viral supply of macromolecules in human main hematopoietic stem cells and lymphocytes. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, mjad018 (2023).
Google Scholar
Migliori, V. et al. ONE-STEP tagging: a flexible methodology for fast site-specific integration by simultaneous reagent supply. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf809 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tareen, A. & Kinney, J. B. Logomaker: lovely sequence logos in Python. Bioinformatics 36, 2272–2274 (2020).
Google Scholar
Passaro, S. et al. Boltz-2: in direction of correct and environment friendly binding affinity prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Bakalar, M. H. et al. Giant serine integrase off-target discovery with deep studying for genome broad prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Leave a Reply