Romero, P. A. & Arnold, F. H. Exploring protein health landscapes by directed evolution. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 866–876 (2009).
Google Scholar
Molina, R. S. et al. In vivo hypermutation and steady evolution. Nat. Rev. Strategies Primers 2, 36 (2022).
Google Scholar
Badran, A. H. & Liu, D. R. Improvement of potent in vivo mutagenesis plasmids with broad mutational spectra. Nat. Commun. 6, 8425 (2015).
Google Scholar
Camps, M., Naukkarinen, J., Johnson, B. P. & Loeb, L. A. Focused gene evolution in Escherichia coli utilizing a extremely error-prone DNA polymerase I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9727–9732 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bull, J. J., Sanjuan, R. & Wilke, C. O. Concept of deadly mutagenesis for viruses. J. Virol. 81, 2930–2939 (2007).
Google Scholar
Esvelt, Okay. M., Carlson, J. C. & Liu, D. R. A system for the continual directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature 472, 499–503 (2011).
Google Scholar
English, J. G. et al. VEGAS as a platform for facile directed evolution in mammalian cells. Cell 178, 748–761 (2019).
Google Scholar
Miller, S. M., Wang, T. & Liu, D. R. Phage-assisted steady and non-continuous evolution. Nat. Protoc. 15, 4101–4127 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yi, X., Khey, J., Kazlauskas, R. J. & Travisano, M. Plasmid hypermutation utilizing a focused synthetic DNA replisome. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg8712 (2021).
Google Scholar
Moore, C. L., Papa, L. J. third & Shoulders, M. D. A processive protein chimera introduces mutations throughout outlined DNA areas in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11560–11564 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cravens, A., Jamil, O. Okay., Kong, D., Sockolosky, J. T. & Smolke, C. D. Polymerase-guided base modifying allows in vivo mutagenesis and speedy protein engineering. Nat. Commun. 12, 1579 (2021).
Google Scholar
Halperin, S. O. et al. CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases allow diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window. Nature 560, 248–252 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. D. et al. Helicase-assisted steady modifying for programmable mutagenesis of endogenous genomes. Science 386, eadn5876 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chu, W. et al. An developed, orthogonal ssDNA generator for focused hypermutation of a number of genomic loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf051 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ravikumar, A., Arzumanyan, G. A., Obadi, M. Okay. A., Javanpour, A. A. & Liu, C. C. Scalable, steady evolution of genes at mutation charges above genomic error thresholds. Cell 175, 1946–1957 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tian, R. et al. Establishing an artificial orthogonal replication system allows accelerated evolution in E. coli. Science 383, 421–426 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tian, R. et al. Engineered bacterial orthogonal DNA replication system for steady evolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1504–1512 (2023).
Google Scholar
Diercks, C. S. et al. An orthogonal T7 replisome for steady hypermutation and accelerated evolution in E. coli. Science 389, 618–622 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ravikumar, A., Arrieta, A. & Liu, C. C. An orthogonal DNA replication system in yeast. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 175–177 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rix, G. et al. Scalable steady evolution for the technology of numerous enzyme variants encompassing promiscuous actions. Nat. Commun. 11, 5644 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wellner, A. et al. Fast technology of potent antibodies by autonomous hypermutation in yeast. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 1057–1064 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rix, G. et al. Steady evolution of user-defined genes at 1 million instances the genomic mutation charge. Science 386, eadm9073 (2024).
Google Scholar
Blount, Z. D. The unexhausted potential of E. coli. eLife 4, e05826 (2015).
Google Scholar
Salas, M., Holguera, I., Redrejo-Rodriguez, M. & de Vega, M. DNA-binding proteins important for protein-primed bacteriophage Φ29 DNA replication. Entrance. Mol. Biosci. 3, 37 (2016).
Google Scholar
Serrano, M. et al. Phage Φ29 protein p6: a viral histone-like protein. Biochimie 76, 981–991 (1994).
Google Scholar
Blanco, L. & Salas, M. Characterization and purification of a phage Φ29-encoded DNA polymerase required for the initiation of replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 5325–5329 (1984).
Google Scholar
Hermoso, J. M., Mendez, E., Soriano, F. & Salas, M. Location of the serine residue concerned within the linkage between the terminal protein and the DNA of phage Φ29. Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 7715–7728 (1985).
Google Scholar
Mendez, J., Blanco, L., Esteban, J. A., Bernad, A. & Salas, M. Initiation of Φ29 DNA replication happens on the second 3′ nucleotide of the linear template: a sliding-back mechanism for protein-primed DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9579–9583 (1992).
Google Scholar
Mendez, J., Blanco, L. & Salas, M. Protein-primed DNA replication: a transition between two modes of priming by a singular DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 16, 2519–2527 (1997).
Google Scholar
Gutierrez, C., Sogo, J. M. & Salas, M. Evaluation of replicative intermediates produced throughout bacteriophage Φ29 DNA replication in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 222, 983–994 (1991).
Google Scholar
Inciarte, M. R., Salas, M. & Sogo, J. M. Construction of replicating DNA molecules of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage Φ29. J. Virol. 34, 187–199 (1980).
Google Scholar
Soengas, M. S., Gutierrez, C. & Salas, M. Helix-destabilizing exercise of Φ29 single-stranded DNA binding protein: impact on the elongation charge throughout strand displacement DNA replication. J. Mol. Biol. 253, 517–529 (1995).
Google Scholar
Meijer, W. J., Horcajadas, J. A. & Salas, M. Φ29 household of phages. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 261–287 (2001).
Google Scholar
Reilly, B. E. & Spizizen, J. Bacteriophage deoxyribonucleate an infection of competent Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 89, 782–790 (1965).
Google Scholar
Camacho, A. et al. Meeting of Bacillus subtilis phage Φ29. 1. Mutants within the cistrons coding for the structural proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 73, 39–55 (1977).
Google Scholar
Camacho, A. & Salas, M. Mechanism for the swap of Φ29 DNA early to late transcription by regulatory protein p4 and histone-like protein p6. EMBO J. 20, 6060–6070 (2001).
Google Scholar
Salas, M. Protein-priming of DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 39–71 (1991).
Google Scholar
Ito, J. Bacteriophage Φ29 terminal protein: its affiliation with the 5′ termini of the Φ29 genome. J. Virol. 28, 895–904 (1978).
Google Scholar
Blanco, L., Lazaro, J. M., de Vega, M., Bonnin, A. & Salas, M. Terminal protein-primed DNA amplification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12198–12202 (1994).
Google Scholar
Mencia, M., Gella, P., Camacho, A., de Vega, M. & Salas, M. Terminal protein-primed amplification of heterologous DNA with a minimal replication system based mostly on phage Φ29. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18655–18660 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cetnar, D. P. & Salis, H. M. Systematic quantification of sequence and structural determinants controlling mRNA stability in bacterial operons. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 318–332 (2021).
Google Scholar
Farasat, I. et al. Environment friendly search, mapping, and optimization of multi-protein genetic programs in numerous micro organism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 731 (2014).
Google Scholar
Salis, H. M., Mirsky, E. A. & Voigt, C. A. Automated design of artificial ribosome binding websites to regulate protein expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 946–950 (2009).
Google Scholar
Blanco, L. & Salas, M. Replication of phage Φ29 DNA with purified terminal protein and DNA polymerase: synthesis of full-length Φ29 DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 6404–6408 (1985).
Google Scholar
Blanco, L. et al. Extremely environment friendly DNA synthesis by the phage Φ29 DNA polymerase. Symmetrical mode of DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8935–8940 (1989).
Google Scholar
Abil, Z. et al. Darwinian evolution of self-replicating DNA in an artificial protocell. Nat. Commun. 15, 9091 (2024).
Google Scholar
Datsenko, Okay. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli Okay-12 utilizing PCR merchandise. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).
Google Scholar
Murphy, Okay. C. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination capabilities to advertise gene alternative in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180, 2063–2071 (1998).
Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, S. et al. Accessibility of the Shine–Dalgarno sequence dictates N-terminal codon bias in E. coli. Mol. Cell 70, 894–905 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kudla, G., Murray, A. W., Tollervey, D. & Plotkin, J. B. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324, 255–258 (2009).
Google Scholar
Cambray, G., Guimaraes, J. C. & Arkin, A. P. Analysis of 244,000 artificial sequences reveals design ideas to optimize translation in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1005–1015 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tian, R. et al. Artificial N-terminal coding sequences for fine-tuning gene expression and metabolic engineering in Bacillus subtilis. Metab. Eng. 55, 131–141 (2019).
Google Scholar
Robertson, W. E. Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code. Science 390, eady4368 (2025).
Google Scholar
de Vega, M., Lazaro, J. M., Salas, M. & Blanco, L. Mutational evaluation of Φ29 DNA polymerase residues performing as ssDNA ligands for 3′–5′ exonucleolysis. J. Mol. Biol. 279, 807–822 (1998).
Google Scholar
de Vega, M., Lazaro, J. M., Salas, M. & Blanco, L. Primer-terminus stabilization on the 3′–5′ exonuclease energetic website of Φ29 DNA polymerase. Involvement of two amino acid residues extremely conserved in proofreading DNA polymerases. EMBO J. 15, 1182–1192 (1996).
Google Scholar
Luria, S. E. & Delbruck, M. Mutations of micro organism from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28, 491–511 (1943).
Google Scholar
Foster, P. L. Strategies for figuring out spontaneous mutation charges. Strategies Enzymol. 409, 195–213 (2006).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. CRISPR–DNA polymerase assisted focused mutagenesis for regulable laboratory evolution. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) (2025).
Li, X. T., Thomason, L. C., Sawitzke, J. A., Costantino, N. & Court docket, D. L. Constructive and damaging choice utilizing the tetA–sacB cassette: recombineering and P1 transduction in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e204 (2013).
Google Scholar
Rains, C. P., Bryson, H. M. & Peters, D. H. Ceftazidime. An replace of its antibacterial exercise, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Medicine 49, 577–617 (1995).
Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. A modified pCas/pTargetF system for CRISPR–Cas9-assisted genome modifying in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochim Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 53, 620–627 (2021).
Google Scholar
Halper, S. M., Hossain, A. & Salis, H. M. Synthesis success calculator: predicting the speedy synthesis of DNA fragments with machine studying. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 1563–1571 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ng, C. Y., Farasat, I., Maranas, C. D. & Salis, H. M. Rational design of an artificial Entner–Doudoroff pathway for improved and controllable NADPH regeneration. Metab. Eng. 29, 86–96 (2015).
Google Scholar
Reis, A. C. & Salis, H. M. An automatic mannequin take a look at system for systematic growth and enchancment of gene expression fashions. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 3145–3156 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zurcher, J. F. et al. Steady synthesis of E. coli genome sections and Mb-scale human DNA meeting. Nature 619, 555–562 (2023).
Google Scholar
Corridor, B. M., Ma, C. X., Liang, P. & Singh, Okay. Okay. Fluctuation evaluation CalculatOR: an online device for the willpower of mutation charge utilizing Luria–Delbruck fluctuation evaluation. Bioinformatics 25, 1564–1565 (2009).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Quick gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Strategies 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Google Scholar
Smith, T., Heger, A. & Sudbery, I. UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in distinctive molecular identifiers to enhance quantification accuracy. Genome Res. 27, 491–499 (2017).
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Google Scholar
Leave a Reply