A MARTÍNEZ, HOST:
President Trump is elevating the potential for navy strikes on Iran.
(SOUNDBITE OF STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: My choice is to unravel this drawback by means of diplomacy. However one factor is definite. I’ll by no means enable the world’s No. 1 sponsor of terror, which they’re by far, to have a nuclear weapon. Cannot let that occur.
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
That was the president at his State of the Union handle earlier this week. Talks between the 2 sides are resulting from proceed subsequent week. Within the meantime, Vice President JD Vance is because of meet at present with Oman’s overseas minister, who has served as a mediator within the talks. That is in response to a supply conversant in the assembly who just isn’t licensed to talk on the report. In a couple of minutes, we’ll converse with a former Center East adviser about how U.S. allies are responding. However first, let’s get the newest info.
MARTÍNEZ: NPR White Home correspondent Franco Ordoñez has been following the president’s rhetoric about Iran. So, Franco, what has to occur from Iran’s viewpoint to ensure that the U.S. to not assault it?
FRANCO ORDOÑEZ, BYLINE: You understand, the factor, A, is Trump hasn’t actually defined what his aims are. What does success appear to be? He additionally hasn’t requested Congress for authorization or taken the chance to totally clarify to the American individuals his reasoning.
MARTÍNEZ: OK. So what has he mentioned?
ORDOÑEZ: Properly, in his speech, President Trump touched on a couple of totally different causes. I imply, first was stopping the nuclear program. Second helps protesters we promised to again if extra have been killed. Properly, tens of 1000’s extra have been killed. You understand, then there may be the stopping of the ballistic missile program that he claims are nearly capable of attain the U.S.
MARTÍNEZ: What about regime change?
ORDOÑEZ: Yeah. I imply, that is one other potential cause. And, you understand, A, I imply, we ought to be clear that Trump just isn’t the primary president to cope with this Iran challenge. I imply, former President Obama was extensively criticized for the nuclear deal that he reached. Many noticed it as weak and really empowering of Iran economically. Throughout the George W. Bush years, Iran accelerated its nuclear program. Bush, in fact, labeled Iran a part of its axis of evil. You understand, this has actually been a problem because the revolution in 1979. I imply, Iran had been a contemporary society, and the federal government was truly an ally to the U.S. The regime, although, that took over was largely inbuilt opposition to the U.S. and to Israel.
MARTÍNEZ: All proper. So then what precisely are the choices? And really, what sort of timeline are we speaking about now?
ORDOÑEZ: I imply, it appears centered on two possible units of targets. One can be, you understand, restricted strikes, maybe in opposition to Iran’s ballistic missile program or nuclear targets or management possibly. A second could possibly be one thing greater – an extended marketing campaign geared toward destabilizing or probably overthrowing the regime. Matthew Kroenig, who labored on the Iranian file on the Pentagon, he instructed me the administration will wish to contemplate Iran’s response, noting that Iran’s response final time was restricted as a result of they knew, or in all probability knew, that the U.S. had restricted goals.
MATTHEW KROENIG: If I have been advising the president and he have been decided to comply with by means of on the redline and use pressure, I might advocate for a extra restricted strike and talk to the regime that that is only a restricted strike to attempt to induce them to have interaction in token retaliation and hope that the battle can de-escalate.
MARTÍNEZ: All proper. So how quickly might all of this occur?
ORDOÑEZ: Yeah. It could possibly be very quickly. The U.S. now has a large navy presence within the Center East, the most important because the run-up to the Iraq Conflict. The U.S. held a 3rd spherical of negotiations with Iranian officers in Geneva Thursday, as you famous, in what observers say could be the final likelihood to forestall a conflict. I imply, clearly, these conferences are crucial. Now, U.S. officers aren’t saying these conferences are decisive, however they’re additionally expressing quite a lot of frustration about progress on nuclear talks or lack of progress, but additionally over the truth that Iran refuses to barter on ballistic missiles. And so they say that is a, quote, “massive, massive drawback.”
MARTÍNEZ: That is White Home correspondent Franco Ordoñez. Thanks loads.
ORDOÑEZ: Thanks, A.
Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
Leave a Reply