December 18, 2025
The Trump administration’s new Nationwide Safety Technique (NSS) depicts a Europe getting ready to collapse. Its malaise, the doc stresses, isn’t just about Russian threats or financial stagnation; reasonably, Europe dangers dropping its id, amid falling birthrates, rising migration, and the alleged silencing of right-wing dissidents. For this, Washington particularly blames the European Union, mentioned to “undermine political liberty and sovereignty.” Nonetheless, all will not be misplaced. The US, each “sentimentally connected” to Europe and in want of steady allies, can domesticate “resistance to Europe’s present trajectory inside European nations.” Washington attracts optimism from the rise of “patriotic”—that’s, right-wing—events across the EU and guarantees to construct up allies within the “wholesome nations of Central, Jap, and Southern Europe.”
General, the NSS internalizes Washington’s pivot towards the “Western Hemisphere” because the publish–Chilly Battle “unipolar second” wanes. The EU seems now not as a vital base of help for the worldwide hegemon however as a supply of regional troubles. As an EU Parliament report on the NSS coyly places it, “President Donald Trump’s ideological agenda options prominently…notably with respect to Europe.” However the alarm amongst European leaders betrays a extra fundamental reality: The Trump administration doesn’t even fake to deal with the EU as a peer. The NSS mentions the EU simply as soon as, in reference to its “transnational” assault on freedom and sovereignty. If Washington has, traditionally, supervised the EU integration course of, right here it overtly derides it.
So, if Trump has European allies in “patriotic” events and sure “wholesome nations,” does this imply pushing for the breakup of the EU? A rumored draft of the NSS reportedly spoke of leaning on MAGA’s ideological allies to tug Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Poland out of the bloc. After the EU slapped a $120 million effective on X earlier this month, Elon Musk likewise tweeted a name for the EU to interrupt up. Nonetheless, it’s additionally clear that Washington has big leverage even with out pushing Brexit-style splits. Rising right-wing forces in addition to states reluctant to loosen ties with Washington hobble any separate EU initiative. Fairly than assume that liberal euro-federalists can pursue their goals for EU independence, it’s essential to know how the bloc’s inner divisions, together with geographical ones, render it susceptible to Trump’s coverage.
New Europeans
Washington’s curiosity in exploiting fault strains inside the EU isn’t new. Even a quarter-century in the past, when the US appeared as a lone superpower, the Bush administration sought to guard this standing from European dissent. This battle flared within the early 2000s, as EU leaders deliberate each a brand new European Structure, and with the accession of a string of recent member states within the former Jap Bloc, from the Baltic all the way down to the Black Sea. Whereas this was a step ahead in EU integration, it raised questions over its skill to face extra independently of the US. The problem crystallized forward of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, because the Bush administration appeared for European accomplices. Tony Blair in Britain, right-wing prime ministers in Italy and Spain, but additionally all of the central-eastern European states about to affix the EU, backed Bush’s “coalition of the keen” and despatched troops to Iraq.
If the EU’s core powers—France and Germany—tried to say a distinctly European coverage, their autonomous push was undercut by others. Paperwork just like the “Letter of Eight,” signed by the European supporters of the battle, or the “Vilnius Letter” from new and aspirant NATO members, expressed a full-throated Atlanticism, rooted in previous US help for nationwide actions within the previous Jap Bloc. Radio Free Europe cited pollsters’ findings that, whereas most Poles opposed the invasion, over half “again[ed] the US politically in any navy motion.” US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld burdened that such states didn’t wish to be led from Paris and Berlin: “You’re pondering of Europe as Germany and France. I don’t. I feel that’s ‘previous Europe’. If you happen to have a look at your complete NATO Europe in the present day, the middle of gravity is shifting to the East.… you have a look at huge numbers of different nations in Europe. They’re not with France and Germany, they’re with the US.”
Present Subject
At this time the states that joined the EU within the mid-2000s are now not “new.” True, few have joined the euro; Poland, simply the most important by each inhabitants and GDP, hasn’t.
Media reporting on elections in Czechia or Romania, or protests in Bulgaria, nonetheless routinely resorts to clichés about whether or not these states will abandon their “European path.” In actuality, the combat is extra over what sort of Europe. Even nationalists who rattling the EU in harsh phrases—attacking its immigration coverage or its deliberate phaseout of petrol vehicles, or portray it as a supply of woke dogmas—extra not often difficulty full-throated calls to give up the EU. Slogans that evoke making the EU a “confederation” or “Europe of countries” as a substitute advocate selective decoupling, hardening borders and reclaiming some nationwide prerogatives, whereas opposing the Inexperienced Deal (a particular however now waning pan-EU agenda) and impressive concepts for an EU military.
Such approaches to altering the EU from inside enchantment to nationalists in each the “new Europe” and the “previous.” They’re by now the stock-in-trade of events like France’s Rassemblement Nationwide and Italy’s ruling proper wing. That is additionally an inner fault line on which the Trump administration can play in its concern to maintain the EU politically divided. Indicative on this sense is Washington’s clear favoritism towards Viktor Orbán’s authorities in Hungary, a recurring dissenter in EU politics, over Poland, a a lot bigger state that’s far nearer to assembly Washington’s nominal precedence of getting NATO members to spend 5 p.c of GDP on protection. If Polish liberals, sympathetic to Donald Tusk’s ruling coalition, marvel why Trump doesn’t extra heartily welcome Poland’s dedication to protection spending, this isn’t the one difficulty.
Poland
Even insofar as Poland has a proudly “pro-European” authorities, it illustrates contradictions within the EU. From 2015 to 2023, it was dominated by the hard-right Regulation and Justice (PiS), whose assaults on the judiciary and behavior of siding with Orbán’s Hungary in key votes earned it black-sheep standing in Brussels. But relations have been improved not simply after former EU official Tusk changed PiS’s Mateusz Morawiecki as Polish prime minister in 2023, however already upon the Russian invasion of Ukraine, after which EU decision-makers more and more credited Poland as a vital pillar of European protection. Poland is each a comparatively massive nation (solely Germany, France, Italy and Spain have greater populations) and one whose economic system has grown a lot sooner than older member-states. At this time, Polish GDP per capita is on a par with Italy; final yr extra migrants moved again to Poland than into Germany.
Removed from eternally catching up with the “previous Europeans,” leaders in Poland and the Baltic States typically in the present day declare to be exhibiting Europe the way in which ahead. This shift in the present day pivots on the EU’s ReArm Europe technique, with a mooted €800 bn funding in rearmament and, at a extra ideological degree, the narrative that older EU members are realizing they need to have listened to Poles and Lithuanians in regards to the Russian menace. This message was strengthened final month with the destruction, by obvious sabotage, of a stretch of rail monitor from Warsaw to Lublin, routinely used to ship European support to Ukraine. Hailing Tusk’s tough-talking response to the incident, European Fee president Ursula von der Leyen burdened the necessity for European navy planning, and credited Poland because the “largest protection spender in Europe.”
Some speculate that such spending may very well be a type of “navy Keynesianism,” and assist revitalize the EU economic system. Nonetheless, Poland factors to the bounds of this strategy, at the very least at present. For whereas this nation is in the present day NATO’s greatest navy spender relative to GDP, its foremost suppliers aren’t its personal protection business or different EU member states—relative minnows by this indicator—however the US and South Korea. Poland is ready to be the principle beneficiary of the EU’s SAFE (Safety Motion for Europe) loans plan, meant to spice up European procurement. But the EU’s reliance on the US for weapons and even vitality, and the latest deal for the so-called “Polonization” to in-source the manufacture of Korean tanks, counsel that different European states are hardly the one attainable companions.
Nor does the EU supply clear various political management. It has a nominal foreign-policy chief, in Estonia’s Kaja Kallas, and its leaders usually cite the battles waged by pro-EU forces in non-member states like Moldova and Georgia as proof of Europe’s ethical authority. But, with regard to Ukraine and Gaza, the EU has taken little notable diplomatic initiative, and Trump’s requires peace talks over Ukraine have repeatedly blindsided European leaders. Confronted with this August’s Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, Berlin and Paris pledged to purchase extra weapons for Kyiv, from Washington, to be able to stiffen Trump’s resolve. But their initiative stays subordinate to his. Furthermore, whereas efforts to play good with Trump have usually concerned British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, extra not often have they drawn on Poland’s Tusk, whose allies complain that different EU leaders reduce him out of diplomacy.
Others lean heavier towards Washington. Whereas Tusk’s broad coalition gained the 2023 parliamentary elections, this June’s presidential contest handed victory to PiS’s favored candidate, Karol Nawrocki. Amongst different issues, he rode discontent at Polish help for Ukrainians, and in workplace repeatedly blocked laws extending welfare advantages for Ukrainian refugees in Poland—ultimately caving, albeit insisting he wouldn’t enable any additional extension. But he, like Tusk, additionally strongly favors a stronger US navy presence in his nation. Tusk’s personal international minister, Radosław Sikorski—hardly a fan of Trump—even mooted, throughout Nawrocki’s go to to Washington in September, that the brand new Polish president’s relations with MAGA may repay, if Washington boosted US troop numbers in his nation. As in opposition to concepts of European “strategic autonomy,” maybe led from Paris or Berlin, Sikorski has emphasised a realistic “strategic concord” the place Europe turns into extra self-reliant, but carefully allied to the US.
Unbiased Europe?
So, is the EU merely a sufferer in all this, or does it have alternatives to forge forward? The top of the battle in Ukraine could also be far off, however may very well be decisive for Europe’s future. It’s reportedly advised, as a part of the Trump administration’s present 20-point draft peace plan, that Ukraine would be part of the EU in 2027. In fact, the concept of integrating such a big and comparatively poor state, far sooner than any earlier member has been allowed to affix, is hardly more likely to obtain the wanted unanimous settlement throughout the EU. The truth that the Trump administration would even counsel this—seemingly with out consulting European leaders themselves—factors to Washington’s curiosity in having Europe take up the social and human prices of the battle, even with out its having an actual say within the final result.
For among the most enthusiastic supporters of EU integration, together with British liberals who now discover themselves outdoors the bloc, all this reveals the necessity for the EU to lastly assert its independence. The conclusion, from the NSS report, that the Trump administration is ideologically hostile to the EU comforts the concept, voiced by historian Timothy Garton Ash, that Europe should band collectively to keep away from a peace deal imposed over the heads of each Ukrainians and European leaders. The place Trump could strive a classical imperial carve-up, such authors argue, EU members and “like-minded states” like Britain or Canada want the “strategic willpower” and “preventing spirit” to assist Ukraine resist, even when their American former patron tries to power Volodymyr Zelenskyy to swallow a foul deal.
Widespread
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
Garton Ash admits many weaknesses within the EU, but concludes that that is finally a query of willpower. Europe’s weaknesses right here sound like a requirement for higher unity. The eventual integration of Ukraine into the EU, Garton Ash suggests, can be a becoming riposte to imperialist visions in Washington and Moscow. But each the alarmist prospect of the EU breaking apart and the idealist imaginative and prescient of EU federalism galvanized by Trump’s hostility, seem overstated. Present tendencies within the bloc, together with the insurance policies advocated by rising hard-right forces, as a substitute level to a extra partial final result: EU-funded funding that may enable member-states to construct up their armed forces, mount new infrastructure tasks, and take measures, as nicely, like reintroducing nationwide service, however with out arriving at a cross-EU navy command, a extra built-in political management, or a very joint diplomatic strategy.
The Trump administration stays unpopular amongst most European populations, and even MAGA’s ideological allies usually chafe in opposition to the concept that they’re subordinate to an American “massive brother.” But, it appears unlikely that detest of Trump can be sufficient to provoke Europeans behind a coherent various international coverage, or certainly that—virtually 4 years into the battle in Ukraine—the EU’s present heads of presidency can rally as-yet-untapped reserves of “preventing spirit” among the many inhabitants. Troublingly, not solely Orbán’s Hungarian authorities but additionally a rising power like Germany’s Various für Deutschland favor reindustrialization based mostly on rearmament exactly provided that it’s not tied to help for Kyiv. To the concept that Ukraine is preventing to defend all of Europe, they reply that Europe must defend itself from Muslims and Africans.
The Trump administration isn’t any omnipotent actor in a position to remold EU politics at will. But it’s nicely in a position to exploit previous fault strains inside EU politics, and the dearth of actually collective “willpower” that essentially the most EU-federalist forces hanker after. For need of actual independence from Washington, in the present day’s EU leaders as a substitute mix their forces within the try to persuade Trump that they’re actually his allies in spite of everything. They, just like the New Europeans of yesteryear, champion Atlanticism for concern that isolationist US Republicans could fail to face with them. Again within the days of the Bush administration, some within the EU resisted the US’s declare to reshape the world by its personal guidelines. At this time, confronted with Trump’s concessions to Russia, most of the identical capitals appear eager to take care of the unipolar second that after was.
Over the previous yr you’ve learn Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky tackle the Trump household’s corruption, set the report straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Wholesome Once more motion, survey the fallout and human value of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Courtroom’s harmful antidemocratic rulings, and amplify profitable ways of resistance on the streets and in Congress.
We publish these tales as a result of when members of our communities are being kidnapped, family debt is climbing, and AI information facilities are inflicting water and electrical energy shortages, we have now an obligation as journalists to do all we are able to to tell the general public.
In 2026, our goal is to do greater than ever earlier than—however we want your help to make that occur.
By December 31, a beneficiant donor will match all donations as much as $75,000. That signifies that your contribution can be doubled, greenback for greenback. If we hit the total match, we’ll be beginning 2026 with $150,000 to spend money on the tales that influence actual individuals’s lives—the sorts of tales that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed shops aren’t overlaying.
Together with your help, our staff will publish main tales that the president and his allies gained’t need you to learn. We’ll cowl the rising military-tech industrial complicated and issues of battle, peace, and surveillance, in addition to the affordability disaster, starvation, housing, healthcare, the surroundings, assaults on reproductive rights, and far more. On the identical time, we’ll think about alternate options to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a greater world, right here and now.
Whereas your present has twice the influence, I’m asking you to help The Nation with a donation in the present day. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers finest outfitted to carry this authoritarian administration to account.
I hope you gained’t miss this second—donate to The Nation in the present day.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and writer, The Nation
Extra from The Nation
Barbara Koeppel
Andrea Mazzarino
Hend Salama Abo Helow
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,'script', '
fbq('init', '233793277040432');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
Leave a Reply