Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. DNA injury, growing old, and most cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1475–1485 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ciccia, A. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA injury response: making it protected to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179–204 (2010).
Google Scholar
Costanzo, M. et al. The genetic panorama of a cell. Science 327, 425–431 (2010).
Google Scholar
Costanzo, M. et al. A world genetic interplay community maps a wiring diagram of mobile perform. Science 353, aaf1420 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tong, A. H. Y. et al. International mapping of the yeast genetic interplay community. Science 303, 808–813 (2004).
Google Scholar
Billmann, M. et al. International genetic interplay community of a human cell maps conserved ideas and informs purposeful interpretation of gene co-essentiality profiles. Cell 189, 3736–3759 (2026).
Google Scholar
Horlbeck, M. A. et al. Mapping the genetic panorama of human cells. Cell 174, 953–967 (2018).
Google Scholar
Domingo, J., Baeza-Centurion, P. & Lehner, B. The causes and penalties of genetic interactions (epistasis). Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 20, 433–460 (2019).
Google Scholar
Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Myers, C. L., Andrews, B. & Boone, C. Charting the genetic interplay map of a cell. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 66–74 (2011).
Google Scholar
Costanzo, M. et al. International genetic networks and the genotype-to-phenotype relationship. Cell 177, 85–100 (2019).
Google Scholar
Beijersbergen, R. L., Wessels, L. F. A. & Bernards, R. Artificial lethality in most cancers therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Most cancers Biol. 1, 141–161 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a category 2 CRISPR–Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hegde, M., Strand, C., Hanna, R. E. & Doench, J. G. Uncoupling of sgRNAs from their related barcodes throughout PCR amplification of combinatorial CRISPR screens. PLoS ONE 13, e0197547 (2018).
Google Scholar
Najm, F. J. et al. Orthologous CRISPR–Cas9 enzymes for combinatorial genetic screens. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 179–189 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shen, J. P. et al. Combinatorial CRISPR–Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions. Nat. Strategies 14, 573–576 (2017).
Google Scholar
Esmaeili Anvar, N. et al. Environment friendly gene knockout and genetic interplay screening utilizing the in4mer CRISPR/Cas12a multiplex knockout platform. Nat. Commun. 15, 3577 (2024).
Google Scholar
Parrish, P. C. R. et al. Discovery of artificial deadly and tumor suppressor paralog pairs within the human genome. Cell Rep. 36, 109597 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dede, M., McLaughlin, M., Kim, E. & Hart, T. Multiplex enCas12a screens detect purposeful buffering amongst paralogs in any other case masked in monogenic Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 21, 262 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T. et al. Genetic interplay mapping and exon-resolution purposeful genomics with a hybrid Cas9–Cas12a platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 638–648 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ito, T. et al. Paralog knockout profiling identifies DUSP4 and DUSP6 as a digenic dependence in MAPK pathway-driven cancers. Nat. Genet. 53, 1664–1672 (2021).
Google Scholar
Thompson, N. A. et al. Combinatorial CRISPR display identifies health results of gene paralogues. Nat. Commun. 12, 1302 (2021).
Google Scholar
DeWeirdt, P. C. et al. Optimization of AsCas12a for combinatorial genetic screens in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 94–104 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas12a variants with elevated actions and improved focusing on ranges for gene, epigenetic and base modifying. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 276–282 (2019).
Google Scholar
Soule, H. D. et al. Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Most cancers Res. 50, 6075–6086 (1990).
Google Scholar
Puleo, J. & Polyak, Okay. The MCF10 mannequin of breast tumor development. Most cancers Res. 81, 4183–4185 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yoon, D.-S. et al. Variable ranges of chromosomal instability and mitotic spindle checkpoint defects in breast most cancers. Am. J. Pathol. 161, 391–397 (2002).
Google Scholar
Volpe, E. et al. The reference genome of the human diploid cell line RPE-1. Nat. Commun. 16, 7751 (2025).
Google Scholar
Noordermeer, S. M. et al. The shieldin advanced mediates 53BP1-dependent DNA restore. Nature 560, 117–121 (2018).
Google Scholar
Feng, W. & Jasin, M. BRCA2 suppresses replication stress-induced mitotic and G1 abnormalities by homologous recombination. Nat. Commun. 8, 525 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. et al. A primary-in-class polymerase theta inhibitor selectively targets homologous-recombination-deficient tumors. Nat. Most cancers 2, 598–610 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hernando, B. et al. Monitoring ongoing chromosomal instability utilizing single-cell whole-genome sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a most cancers dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mani, R., St.Onge, R. P., Hartman, J. L., Giaever, G. & Roth, F. P. Defining genetic interplay. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3461–3466 (2008).
Google Scholar
Elena, S. F. & Lenski, R. E. Take a look at of synergistic interactions amongst deleterious mutations in micro organism. Nature 390, 395–398 (1997).
Google Scholar
Chou, J., Lin, C., Kim, S., Chen, J. & Hart, T. Evaluation of combinatorial knockout CRISPR screens with GRAPE: genetic interplay regression evaluation of pairwise results. Preprint at bioRxiv (2026).
Cao, L. et al. A selective requirement for 53BP1 within the organic response to genomic instability induced by Brca1 deficiency. Mol. Cell 35, 534–541 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bunting, S. F. et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 141, 243–254 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bouwman, P. et al. 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is related to triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 688–695 (2010).
Google Scholar
Garner, E., Kim, Y., Lach, F. P., Kottemann, M. C. & Smogorzewska, A. Human GEN1 and the SLX4-associated nucleases MUS81 and SLX1 are important for the decision of replication-induced Holliday junctions. Cell Rep. 5, 207–215 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sarbajna, S., Davies, D. & West, S. C. Roles of SLX1–SLX4, MUS81–EME1, and GEN1 in avoiding genome instability and mitotic disaster. Genes Dev. 28, 1124–1136 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hustedt, N. et al. Management of homologous recombination by the HROB–MCM8–MCM9 pathway. Genes Dev 33, 1397–1415 (2019).
Google Scholar
Alvarez-Quilon, A. et al. Endogenous DNA 3′ blocks are vulnerabilities for BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency and are reversed by the APE2 nuclease. Mol. Cell 78, 1152–1165 (2020).
Google Scholar
AACR Venture GENIE Consortium. AACR Venture GENIE: powering precision drugs by a world consortium. Most cancers Discov. 7, 818–831 (2017).
Sultana, R. et al. Concentrating on XRCC1 deficiency in breast most cancers for personalised remedy. Most cancers Res. 73, 1621–1634 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ali, R. et al. XRCC1 poor triple adverse breast cancers are delicate to ATR, ATM and Wee1 inhibitor both alone or together with olaparib. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 12, 1758835920974201 (2020).
Google Scholar
Riabinska, A. et al. Therapeutic focusing on of a sturdy non-oncogene dependancy to PRKDC in ATM-defective tumors. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 189ra178 (2013).
Google Scholar
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships amongst sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D980–D985 (2014).
Google Scholar
Prakash, R. et al. Distinct pathways of homologous recombination managed by the SWS1–SWSAP1–SPIDR advanced. Nat. Commun. 12, 4255 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tummala, H. et al. ERCC6L2 mutations hyperlink a definite bone-marrow-failure syndrome to DNA restore and mitochondrial perform. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 246–256 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yin, Y. et al. Part separation of ERCC6L2–CtIP regulates the extent of DNA finish resection. Nat. Cell Biol. 27, 1771–1784 (2025).
Google Scholar
Touzot, F. et al. Operate of Apollo (SNM1B) at telomere highlighted by a splice variant recognized in a affected person with Hoyeraal–Hreidarsson syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10097–10102 (2010).
Google Scholar
Akhter, S., Lam, Y. C., Chang, S. & Legerski, R. J. The telomeric protein SNM1B/Apollo is required for regular cell proliferation and embryonic improvement. Getting older Cell 9, 1047–1056 (2010).
Google Scholar
Olivieri, M. et al. A genetic map of the response to DNA injury in human cells. Cell 182, 481–496 (2020).
Google Scholar
Joshua, M. D. et al. Extracting organic insights from the Venture Achilles genome-scale CRISPR screens in most cancers cell traces. Preprint at bioRxiv (2019).
Pan, J. et al. Interrogation of mammalian protein advanced construction, perform, and membership utilizing genome-scale health screens. Cell Syst. 6, 555–568 (2018).
Google Scholar
Meldal, B. H. M. et al. Complicated Portal 2018: prolonged content material and enhanced visualization instruments for macromolecular complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D550–D558 (2019).
Google Scholar
Meyers, R. M. et al. Computational correction of copy quantity impact improves specificity of CRISPR–Cas9 essentiality screens in most cancers cells. Nat. Genet. 49, 1779–1784 (2017).
Google Scholar
Behan, F. M. et al. Prioritization of most cancers therapeutic targets utilizing CRISPR–Cas9 screens. Nature 568, 511–516 (2019).
Google Scholar
Segrè, D., DeLuna, A., Church, G. M. & Kishony, R. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37, 77–83 (2005).
Google Scholar
Bryant, H. E. et al. Particular killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434, 913–917 (2005).
Google Scholar
Farmer, H. et al. Concentrating on the DNA restore defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic technique. Nature 434, 917–921 (2005).
Google Scholar
Panday, A. et al. FANCM regulates restore pathway selection at stalled replication forks. Mol. Cell 81, 2428–2444 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dev, H. et al. Shieldin advanced promotes DNA end-joining and counters homologous recombination in BRCA1-null cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 954–965 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ghezraoui, H. et al. 53BP1 cooperation with the REV7–shieldin advanced underpins DNA structure-specific NHEJ. Nature 560, 122–127 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gupta, R. et al. DNA restore community evaluation reveals shieldin as a key regulator of NHEJ and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Cell 173, 972–988 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mirman, Z. et al. 53BP1–RIF1–shieldin counteracts DSB resection by CST- and Polα-dependent fill-in. Nature 560, 112–116 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fielden, J. et al. Complete interrogation of artificial lethality within the DNA injury response. Nature 640, 1093–1102 (2025).
Google Scholar
Feng, S. et al. Profound artificial lethality between SMARCAL1 and FANCM. Mol. Cell 84, 4522–4537 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shor, E., Weinstein, J. & Rothstein, R. A genetic display for top3 suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies SHU1, SHU2, PSY3 and CSM2: 4 genes concerned in error-free DNA restore. Genetics 169, 1275–1289 (2005).
Google Scholar
Burgers, P. M. J. & Kunkel, T. A. Eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 417–438 (2017).
Google Scholar
da Costa, A. A. et al. Single-stranded DNA hole accumulation is a purposeful biomarker for USP1 inhibitor sensitivity. Most cancers Res. 84, 3435–3446 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huang, T. T. et al. Regulation of monoubiquitinated PCNA by DUB autocleavage. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 339–347 (2006).
Google Scholar
Garcia-Rodriguez, N., Wong, R. P. & Ulrich, H. D. Features of ubiquitin and SUMO in DNA replication and replication stress. Entrance. Genet. 7, 87 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bellelli, R. et al. Polε instability drives replication stress, irregular improvement, and tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell 70, 707–721 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bass, T. E. et al. ETAA1 acts at stalled replication forks to keep up genome integrity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1185–1195 (2016).
Google Scholar
Haahr, P. et al. Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1196–1207 (2016).
Google Scholar
Higgs, M. R. et al. BOD1L is required to suppress deleterious resection of pressured replication forks. Mol. Cell 59, 462–477 (2015).
Google Scholar
Parrilla-Castellar, E. R., Arlander, S. J. & Karnitz, L. Dial 9-1-1 for DNA injury: the Rad9–Hus1–Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp advanced. DNA Restore (Amst.) 3, 1009–1014 (2004).
Google Scholar
Balmus, G. et al. Illness severity in a mouse mannequin of ataxia telangiectasia is modulated by the DNA injury checkpoint gene Hus1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 3408–3420 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shen, J. P. et al. Chemogenetic profiling identifies RAD17 as synthetically deadly with checkpoint kinase inhibition. Oncotarget 6, 35755–35769 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lin, Okay. et al. A scalable platform for environment friendly CRISPR–Cas9 chemical–genetic screens of DNA damage-inducing compounds. Sci. Rep. 14, 2508 (2024).
Google Scholar
Koppensteiner, R. et al. Impact of MRE11 loss on PARP-inhibitor sensitivity in endometrial most cancers in vitro. PLoS ONE 9, e100041 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dumoulin, I. et al. PARG inhibition sequesters nuclear PAR-binding proteins, together with XRCC1 and its companions, into nuclear condensates to elicit cytotoxicity. Preprint at bioRxiv (2026).
Nie, L. et al. DePARylation is crucial for S part development and cell survival. eLife 12, RP89303 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. W. et al. MCM8IP prompts the MCM8–9 helicase to advertise DNA synthesis and homologous recombination upon DNA injury. Nat. Commun. 11, 2948 (2020).
Google Scholar
Griffin, W. C. et al. A multi-functional position for the MCM8/9 helicase advanced in sustaining fork integrity throughout replication stress. Nat. Commun. 13, 5090 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gan, G. N., Wittschieben, J. P., Wittschieben, B. Ø & Wooden, R. D. DNA polymerase zeta (Pol ζ) in greater eukaryotes. Cell Res. 18, 174–183 (2008).
Google Scholar
Harrigan, J. A. et al. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 193, 97–108 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lukas, C. et al. 53BP1 nuclear our bodies type round DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes below replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 243–253 (2011).
Google Scholar
Findlay, S. et al. SHLD2/FAM35A co-operates with REV7 to coordinate DNA double-strand break restore pathway selection. EMBO J. 37, e100158 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tomida, J. et al. FAM35A associates with REV7 and modulates DNA injury responses of regular and BRCA1-defective cells. EMBO J. 37, e99543 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hara, Okay. et al. Crystal construction of human REV7 in advanced with a human REV3 fragment and structural implication of the interplay between DNA polymerase zeta and REV1. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12299–12307 (2010).
Google Scholar
Liang, L. et al. Molecular foundation for meeting of the shieldin advanced and its implications for NHEJ. Nat. Commun. 11, 1972 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wojtaszek, J. L. et al. A small molecule focusing on mutagenic translesion synthesis improves chemotherapy. Cell 178, 152–159 (2019).
Google Scholar
Taglialatela, A. et al. REV1–Polζ maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient most cancers cells by mutagenic restore of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps. Mol. Cell 81, 4008–4025 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tirman, S. et al. Temporally distinct post-replicative restore mechanisms fill PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps in human cells. Mol. Cell 81, 4026–4040 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. Okay., Medley, E. A. & Brown, G. W. Two impartial DNA restore pathways trigger mutagenesis in template switching poor Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 225, iyad153 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mann, A. et al. POLθ prevents MRE11–NBS1–CtIP-dependent fork breakage within the absence of BRCA2/RAD51 by filling lagging-strand gaps. Mol. Cell 82, 4218–4231 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hanthi, Y. W. et al. RAD51 protects abasic websites to stop replication fork breakage. Mol. Cell 84, 3026–3043 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chan, Y. W., Fugger, Okay. & West, S. C. Unresolved recombination intermediates result in ultra-fine anaphase bridges, chromosome breaks and aberrations. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 92–103 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chan, Y. W. & West, S. C. Spatial management of the GEN1 Holliday junction resolvase ensures genome stability. Nat. Commun. 5, 4844 (2014).
Google Scholar
Adam, S. et al. The CIP2A–TOPBP1 axis safeguards chromosome stability and is an artificial deadly goal for BRCA-mutated most cancers. Nat. Most cancers 2, 1357–1371 (2021).
Google Scholar
De Marco Zompit, M. et al. The CIP2A–TOPBP1 advanced safeguards chromosomal stability throughout mitosis. Nat. Commun. 13, 4143 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brambati, A. et al. RHINO directs MMEJ to restore DNA breaks in mitosis. Science 381, 653–660 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-F. et al. Mitotic clustering of pulverized chromosomes from micronuclei. Nature 618, 1041–1048 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cotta-Ramusino, C. et al. A DNA injury response display identifies RHINO, a 9-1-1 and TopBP1 interacting protein required for ATR signaling. Science 332, 1313–1317 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ip, S. C. Y. et al. Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from people and yeast. Nature 456, 357–361 (2008).
Google Scholar
Benitez, A. et al. GEN1 promotes frequent fragile website expression. Cell Rep. 42, 112062 (2023).
Google Scholar
Niraj, J., Farkkila, A. & D’Andrea, A. D. The Fanconi anemia pathway in most cancers. Annu. Rev. Most cancers Biol. 3, 457–478 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fleury, H. et al. The APE2 nuclease is important for DNA double-strand break restore by microhomology-mediated finish becoming a member of. Mol. Cell 83, 1429–1445 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mateos-Gomez, P. A. et al. Mammalian polymerase θ promotes different NHEJ and suppresses recombination. Nature 518, 254–257 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ceccaldi, R. et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are depending on Polθ-mediated restore. Nature 518, 258–262 (2015).
Google Scholar
Mengwasser, Okay. E. et al. Genetic screens reveal FEN1 and APEX2 as BRCA2 artificial deadly targets. Mol. Cell 73, 885–899 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gelot, C. et al. Polθ is phosphorylated by PLK1 to restore double-strand breaks in mitosis. Nature 621, 415–422 (2023).
Google Scholar
van Zeeburg, H. J. et al. Technology and molecular characterization of head and neck squamous cell traces of Fanconi anemia sufferers. Most cancers Res. 65, 1271–1276 (2005).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. T. et al. Fanconi anemia–isogenic head and neck most cancers cell line pairs: a fundamental and translational science useful resource. Int. J. Most cancers 153, 183–196 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bansbach, C. E., Betous, R., Lovejoy, C. A., Glick, G. G. & Cortez, D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 23, 2405–2414 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ciccia, A. et al. The SIOD dysfunction protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein concerned in replication fork restart. Genes Dev. 23, 2415–2425 (2009).
Google Scholar
Postow, L., Woo, E. M., Chait, B. T. & Funabiki, H. Identification of SMARCAL1 as a part of the DNA injury response. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 35951–35961 (2009).
Google Scholar
Betous, R. et al. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to keep up genome stability throughout DNA replication. Genes Dev. 26, 151–162 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ciccia, A. et al. Polyubiquitinated PCNA recruits the ZRANB3 translocase to keep up genomic integrity after replication stress. Mol. Cell 47, 396–409 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yuan, J., Ghosal, G. & Chen, J. The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 23, 2394–2399 (2009).
Google Scholar
Yusufzai, T., Kong, X., Yokomori, Okay. & Kadonaga, J. T. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA restore websites by way of an interplay with RPA. Genes Dev. 23, 2400–2404 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gari, Okay., Decaillet, C., Delannoy, M., Wu, L. & Constantinou, A. Transforming of DNA replication constructions by the department level translocase FANCM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16107–16112 (2008).
Google Scholar
Yan, Z. et al. A histone-fold advanced and FANCM type a conserved DNA-remodeling advanced to keep up genome stability. Mol. Cell 37, 865–878 (2010).
Google Scholar
Abbouche, L., Bythell-Douglas, R. & Deans, A. J. FANCM branchpoint translocase: grasp of traverse, reverse and opposed DNA restore. DNA Restore (Amst.) 140, 103701 (2024).
Google Scholar
Singh, T. R. et al. MHF1–MHF2, a histone-fold-containing protein advanced, participates within the Fanconi anemia pathway by way of FANCM. Mol. Cell 37, 879–886 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ciccia, A. et al. Identification of FAAP24, a Fanconi anemia core advanced protein that interacts with FANCM. Mol. Cell 25, 331–343 (2007).
Google Scholar
Canela, A. et al. DNA breaks and finish resection measured genome-wide by finish sequencing. Mol. Cell 63, 898–911 (2016).
Google Scholar
Stoepker, C. et al. Defects within the Fanconi anemia pathway and chromatid cohesion in head and neck most cancers. Most cancers Res. 75, 3543–3553 (2015).
Google Scholar
Meetei, A. R. et al. A human ortholog of archaeal DNA restore protein Hef is flawed in Fanconi anemia complementation group M. Nat. Genet. 37, 958–963 (2005).
Google Scholar
Schmiester, M. & Demuth, I. SNM1B/Apollo within the DNA injury response and telomere upkeep. Oncotarget 8, 48398–48409 (2017).
Google Scholar
Demuth, I., Digweed, M. & Concannon, P. Human SNM1B is required for regular mobile response to each DNA interstrand crosslink-inducing brokers and ionizing radiation. Oncogene 23, 8611–8618 (2004).
Google Scholar
Mason, J. M. et al. The SNM1B/APOLLO DNA nuclease features in decision of replication stress and upkeep of frequent fragile website stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 4901–4913 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bae, J. B. et al. Snm1B/Apollo mediates replication fork collapse and S part checkpoint activation in response to DNA interstrand cross-links. Oncogene 27, 5045–5056 (2008).
Google Scholar
Liu, L. et al. SNM1B/Apollo interacts with astrin and is required for the prophase cell cycle checkpoint. Cell Cycle 8, 628–638 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wu, P., van Overbeek, M., Rooney, S. & de Lange, T. Apollo contributes to G overhang upkeep and protects leading-end telomeres. Mol. Cell 39, 606–617 (2010).
Google Scholar
van Overbeek, M. & de Lange, T. Apollo, an Artemis-related nuclease, interacts with TRF2 and protects human telomeres in S part. Curr. Biol. 16, 1295–1302 (2006).
Google Scholar
Lam, Y. C. et al. SNM1B/Apollo protects leading-strand telomeres towards NHEJ-mediated restore. EMBO J. 29, 2230–2241 (2010).
Google Scholar
Myler, L. R. et al. DNA-PK and the TRF2 iDDR inhibit MRN-initiated resection at leading-end telomeres. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1346–1356 (2023).
Google Scholar
Eickhoff, P. et al. Chromosome finish safety by RAP1-mediated inhibition of DNA-PK. Nature 642, 1090–1096 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. A shared docking motif in TRF1 and TRF2 used for differential recruitment of telomeric proteins. Science 319, 1092–1096 (2008).
Google Scholar
Du, D. et al. Genetic interplay mapping in mammalian cells utilizing CRISPR interference. Nat. Strategies 14, 577–580 (2017).
Google Scholar
Simpson, D., Ling, J., Jing, Y. & Adamson, B. Mapping the genetic interplay community of PARP inhibitor response. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Norman, T. M. et al. Exploring genetic interplay manifolds constructed from wealthy single-cell phenotypes. Science 365, 786–793 (2019).
Google Scholar
Herken, B. W. et al. Giant-scale mapping of environmental-genetic interactions illustrates the dynamic nature of cell-cycle and DNA restore regulation. Mol. Cell 86, 757–773 (2026).
Google Scholar
Tang, A., Ardy, R. C., Mendes, R. E. & Norman, T. M. Scaling perturbations: past genome-scale CRISPR screens. Preprint at bioRxiv (2026).
Sanson, Okay. R. et al. Optimized libraries for CRISPR–Cas9 genetic screens with a number of modalities. Nat. Commun. 9, 5416 (2018).
Google Scholar
Seppa, I. M. et al. MRN–CtIP, EXO1, and DNA2–WRN/BLM act bidirectionally to course of DNA gaps in PARPi-treated cells with out strand cleavage. Genes Dev. 39, 582–602 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dungrawala, H. et al. The replication checkpoint prevents two varieties of fork collapse with out regulating replisome stability. Mol. Cell 59, 998–1010 (2015).
Google Scholar
Martin, S. Okay. & Wooden, R. D. DNA polymerase ζ in DNA replication and restore. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 8348–8361 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chan, Okay. L. & Hickson, I. D. New insights into the formation and backbone of ultra-fine anaphase bridges. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 906–912 (2011).
Google Scholar
Martin, P. R. et al. The CIP2A–TOPBP1 axis facilitates mitotic DNA restore by way of MiDAS and MMEJ. Nat. Commun. 16, 10623 (2025).
Google Scholar
de Haan, L. et al. CIP2A mediates mitotic recruitment of SLX4/MUS81/XPF to resolve replication stress-induced DNA lesions. Nat. Commun. 17, 13 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bagge, J. et al. TopBP1 coordinates DNA restore synthesis in mitosis by way of recruitment of the nuclease scaffold SLX4. Commun. Biol. 8, 1005 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kim, Y. et al. Mutations of the SLX4 gene in Fanconi anemia. Nat. Genet. 43, 142–146 (2011).
Google Scholar
Klein Douwel, D. et al. XPF–ERCC1 acts in unhooking DNA interstrand crosslinks in cooperation with FANCD2 and FANCP/SLX4. Mol. Cell 54, 460–471 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Walter, J. C. Mechanism and regulation of incisions throughout DNA interstrand cross-link restore. DNA Restore (Amst.) 19, 135–142 (2014).
Google Scholar
Osman, F. & Whitby, M. C. Rising roles for centromere-associated proteins in DNA restore and genetic recombination. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 1726–1730 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tao, Y. et al. The construction of the FANCM–MHF advanced reveals bodily options for purposeful meeting. Nat. Commun. 3, 782 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zafar, F. et al. Regulation of mitotic recombination between DNA repeats in centromeres. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 11222–11235 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cox, Okay. E., Marechal, A. & Flynn, R. L. SMARCAL1 resolves replication stress at ALT telomeres. Cell Rep. 14, 1032–1040 (2016).
Google Scholar
Silva, B. et al. FANCM limits ALT exercise by proscribing telomeric replication stress induced by deregulated BLM and R-loops. Nat. Commun. 10, 2253 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lu, R. et al. The FANCM–BLM–TOP3A–RMI advanced suppresses different lengthening of telomeres (ALT). Nat. Commun. 10, 2252 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rivera, T., Haggblom, C., Cosconati, S. & Karlseder, J. A steadiness between elongation and trimming regulates telomere stability in stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 30–39 (2017).
Google Scholar
Poole, L. A. et al. SMARCAL1 maintains telomere integrity throughout DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14864–14869 (2015).
Google Scholar
Taglialatela, A. et al. SMARCAL1 is a candidate therapeutic goal for ALT-positive tumors. Genes Dev. 40, 1283–1303 (2026).
Google Scholar
Brickner, J. R., Garzon, J. L. & Cimprich, Okay. A. Strolling a tightrope: the advanced balancing act of R-loops in genome stability. Mol. Cell 82, 2267–2297 (2022).
Google Scholar
Carnie, C. J. et al. ERCC6L2 mitigates replication stress and promotes centromere stability. Cell Rep. 42, 112329 (2023).
Google Scholar
Reichl, P. I. et al. The ERCC6L2–MRI–KU advanced coordinates NHEJ at staggered DNA double-strand breaks. Preprint at bioRxiv (2025).
Goodman, M. F. & Woodgate, R. Translesion DNA polymerases. Chilly Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a010363 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lenain, C. et al. The Apollo 5′ exonuclease features along with TRF2 to guard telomeres from DNA restore. Curr. Biol. 16, 1303–1310 (2006).
Google Scholar
Aird, E. J. et al. ERCC6L2 ensures restore constancy for staggered-end DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Commun. 17, 2743 (2026).
Google Scholar
Han, J. et al. ATM controls the extent of DNA finish resection by eliciting sequential posttranslational modifications of CtIP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022600118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rabl, J. BRCA1-A and BRISC: multifunctional molecular machines for ubiquitin signaling. Biomolecules 10, 1503 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hu, Y. et al. RAP80-directed tuning of BRCA1 homologous recombination perform at ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci. Genes Dev. 25, 685–700 (2011).
Google Scholar
Elango, R. et al. The structure-specific endonuclease advanced SLX4–XPF regulates Tus–Ter-induced homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 801–812 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kiiski, J. I. et al. Exome sequencing identifies FANCM as a susceptibility gene for triple-negative breast most cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15172–15177 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lopes, J. L., Chaudhry, S., Lopes, G. S., Levin, N. Okay. & Tainsky, M. A. FANCM, RAD1, CHEK1 and TP53I3 act as BRCA-like tumor suppressors and are mutated in hereditary ovarian most cancers. Most cancers Genet. 235–236, 57–64 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brosnan-Cashman, J. A. et al. SMARCAL1 loss and different lengthening of telomeres (ALT) are enriched in large cell glioblastoma. Mod. Pathol. 34, 1810–1819 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Most cancers-associated SMARCAL1 loss-of-function mutations promote different lengthening of telomeres and tumorigenesis in telomerase-negative glioblastoma cells. Neuro Oncol. 25, 1563–1575 (2023).
Google Scholar
Diplas, B. H. et al. The genomic panorama of TERT promoter wildtype–IDH wildtype glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 9, 2087 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ballinger, M. L. et al. Heritable defects in telomere and mitotic perform selectively predispose to sarcomas. Science 379, 253–260 (2023).
Google Scholar
Golubicki, M. et al. Germline biallelic Mcm8 variants are related to early-onset Lynch-like syndrome. JCI Perception 5, e140698 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goldberg, Y. et al. MCM9 is related to germline predisposition to early-onset most cancers—medical proof. NPJ Genom. Med. 6, 78 (2021).
Google Scholar
Choi, M., Kipps, T. & Kurzrock, R. ATM mutations in most cancers: therapeutic implications. Mol. Most cancers Ther. 15, 1781–1791 (2016).
Google Scholar
Aditi et al. Genome instability impartial of sort I interferon signaling drives neuropathology attributable to impaired ribonucleotide excision restore. Neuron 109, 3962–3979 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M. et al. CRISPR screens determine genomic ribonucleotides as a supply of PARP-trapping lesions. Nature 559, 285–289 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yang, X. et al. A public genome-scale lentiviral expression library of human ORFs. Nat. Strategies 8, 659–661 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering utilizing CRISPR/Cas methods. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hart, T., Brown, Okay. R., Sircoulomb, F., Rottapel, R. & Moffat, J. Measuring error charges in genomic perturbation screens: gold requirements for human purposeful genomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 733 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hart, T. et al. Analysis and design of genome-wide CRISPR/SpCas9 knockout screens. G3 (Bethesda) 7, 2719–2727 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ng, P. C. & Henikoff, S. SIFT: predicting amino acid modifications that have an effect on protein perform. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3812–3814 (2003).
Google Scholar
Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., Zimek, A. & Sander, J. Hierarchical density estimates for knowledge clustering, visualization, and outlier detection. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Information 10, 1–51 (2015).
Google Scholar
Steinegger, M. & Soding, J. MMseqs2 permits delicate protein sequence trying to find the evaluation of huge knowledge units. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mirdita, M. et al. Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D170–D176 (2017).
Google Scholar
Katoh, Okay. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT a number of sequence alignment software program model 7: enhancements in efficiency and value. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G. & Elofsson, A. Improved prediction of protein–protein interactions utilizing AlphaFold2. Nat. Commun. 13, 1265 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Strategies 19, 679–682 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Extremely correct protein construction prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Evans, R. et al. Protein advanced prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv (2022).
Oughtred, R. et al. The BioGRID database: a complete biomedical useful resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. 30, 187–200 (2021).
Google Scholar
Maciejowski, J., Li, Y., Bosco, N., Campbell, P. J. & de Lange, T. Chromothripsis and kataegis induced by telomere disaster. Cell 163, 1641–1654 (2015).
Google Scholar
Richardson, C. D. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 genome modifying in human cells happens by way of the Fanconi anemia pathway. Nat. Genet. 50, 1132–1139 (2018).
Google Scholar
Neelsen, Okay. J., Chaudhuri, A. R., Follonier, C., Herrador, R. & Lopes, M. Visualization and interpretation of eukaryotic DNA replication intermediates in vivo by electron microscopy. Strategies Mol. Biol. 1094, 177–208 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wong, N., John, S., Nussenzweig, A. & Canela, A. END-seq: an unbiased, high-resolution, and genome-wide method to map DNA double-strand breaks and resection in human cells. Strategies Mol. Biol. 2153, 9–31 (2021).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of quick DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ramirez, F. et al. deepTools2: a subsequent technology internet server for deep-sequencing knowledge evaluation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
Google Scholar