Transcript
NEAL CONAN, HOST:
That is TALK OF THE NATION. I am Neal Conan, in Washington. Day-after-day on this program, we attempt to deal with the speak of the nation, a very powerful, essentially the most compelling tales, like landmark Supreme Court docket selections, civil conflict in Syria, local weather change, politics and difficult occasions.
On our final day, we predict it is applicable so that you can set the agenda. Name, inform us: What is the speak of the nation? It may be an enormous worldwide story you’ve got been following for weeks, or an area information occasion that has your neighborhood abuzz. We have additionally invited a number of of our favorites right here at NPR to hitch us. And later in this system: What’s the finest goodbye card you ever bought? You possibly can electronic mail us on that now: speak@npr.org.
And if you wish to inform us what is the speak of the nation, our telephone quantity is 800-989-8255. Electronic mail us: speak@npr.org. You may as well be part of the dialog on our web site. That is at npr.org, and click on on TALK OF THE NATION.
And let’s have a look at if we are able to get Heather on the road. Heather’s with us from Tampa.
HEATHER: Hello, sure. I believe probably the most necessary issues that is happening proper now is definitely the particular session in Texas to attempt to push by way of abortion restrictions.
CONAN: And the filibuster the opposite day by State Senator Wendy Davis.
HEATHER: Proper, which is totally unbelievable. She deserves unbelievable assist and simply recognition for that effort. I believe that was a extremely great stand for ladies’s rights.
CONAN: And that the governor plans to name one other session, I believe, as quickly as subsequent week, to deliver again the invoice. And I believe the good expectation is that it’ll move fairly simply.
HEATHER: I do know that, and I am extremely disenchanted in Governor Perry’s resolution to do this.
CONAN: I’m wondering additionally, there’s been some allegations of hypocrisy. Democrats and folks on the left have typically been impatient with Republican filibusters, significantly in the US Senate.
HEATHER: Proper, and I can perceive that, however I believe there is a distinction to be made. It is one factor to face up and really speak for 11 hours. It is one other factor to place by way of kind of a procedural filibuster that does not in any means take any braveness. It is basically a method to simply kind of weasel out of getting to have a dialogue on the subjects of debate.
CONAN: Heather, thanks very a lot for the decision.
HEATHER: Thanks.
CONAN: And because it occurs, now we have NPR senior Washington editor Ron Elving with us right here in Studio 42. And Ron, good to have you ever again, as at all times.
RON ELVING, BYLINE: Good to be with you, Neal. You are one in every of my favorites.
(LAUGHTER)
CONAN: Oh, properly, thanks very a lot for that. And Heather’s level, the procedural filibuster, this has turn out to be an establishment in the US Senate, the place someone merely has to threaten a filibuster, then abruptly you want 60 votes to get something handed.
ELVING: Heather makes a classy distinction right here about completely different sorts of filibusters – subtle, however one I believe we are able to all relate to, and that’s the distinction between truly getting up Jimmy Stewart-style and holding the ground for prolonged durations of time. Wendy Davis did this for, I consider, 11 hours, with out the good thing about having the ability to contact a bit of furnishings to lean on, as a result of that was forbidden by the principles, denied a again brace and so forth, and compelled to make her stand on her ft.
And that sort of bodily braveness I believe folks do respect. In addition they see that there is a sure bodily restrict to it, whereas the sort of digital filibuster that now we have as we speak in the US Senate is an excuse, actually, for folks to only put the kibosh on something that they do not like and put such an unbelievable penalty by way of time on attempting to cope with it that the Senate will again off. And we see that on a regular basis.
CONAN: Do we predict Rand Paul goes to put on pink sneakers the following time he tries it?
ELVING: And I ought to say Rand Paul is the final man we have seen stand up and do a multi-hour filibuster within the model that Wendy Davis did down in Austin, Texas. He did it as a Republican senator against among the makes use of we’re seeing of automated gear, drone, NSA kind of surveillance and points which have turn out to be actually fairly salient since he did it.
CONAN: And I’ve to ask you, the speak of the nation as we speak in Washington, D.C. appears to be in the US Senate, the place it seems to be as if the immigration invoice might move as quickly as as we speak.
ELVING: This can be a week of historic days. And the historic day within the Senate, with respect to immigration, already as we speak they’ve invoked cloture, ending a filibuster try – or not less than the specter of a filibuster – with 68 votes, greater than the 60 which are required to chop off debate. In order that makes it fairly clear the invoice goes to move.
And afterward as we speak, the Senate could have its ultimate vote on its immigration overhaul. That is one thing roughly that is been within the works for a decade or extra, again to the final invoice of its sort in 1986. It’s fairly momentous. It might imply an excellent deal to a large number of People and potential, potential People. And it is also going to be an enormous controversy when it will get to the Home.
CONAN: The place one of many Home members of the management, the Republican management, stated as we speak this invoice is useless on arrival.
ELVING: As written by the Senate it’s, at this stage of the method. The query is: Will the Home move something in any respect? If the Home passes some sort of an immigration invoice of its personal, one thing it likes higher, that the Republican majority likes higher because the speaker says he will not deliver the rest to the ground, then can that invoice go to a convention with the Senate? That will produce a convention report. That would come again to the Senate and – excuse me, come again to each the Senate and the Home and conceivably be handed in a bipartisan style by each chambers.
CONAN: Within the meantime, there isn’t any method to keep away from these different historic days, the place the Voting Rights Act was basically gutted by the US Supreme Court docket, after which yesterday, momentous selections on homosexual marriage.
ELVING: That is appropriate. And curiously, for all these individuals who watch the Supreme Court docket – significantly those that watch it with some jaundiced eye – we heard a lot the identical objection to every of these selections by these whose ox had been gored.
We noticed the conservative bloc of justices – that’s to say Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy – all collectively in voting on the Voting Rights Act. And we noticed all of them collectively opposing the transfer on homosexual marriage, aside from Justice Kennedy, who simply 10 years earlier, on the exact same day – this was the tenth anniversary – had written the historic Lawrence case opinion, wherein he struck down legal guidelines that banned homosexual intercourse.
That was an enormous, watershed second, and at the moment, Justice Scalia stated that was an overreach and that in 10 years, we might be legalizing homosexual marriage. Folks thought on the time Scalia was being hyperbolic. He was not solely being predictive, he was exactly predictive, to the day.
CONAN: And it is fascinating: He additionally predicted in yesterday’s dissent on the Protection of Marriage Act that it is a false entrance, and we’re simply establishing for the opposite shoe to drop and for this majority on the courtroom to ban – ban bans on homosexual marriage, to legalize homosexual marriage throughout the board.
ELVING: Effectively, David Boies – who was one of many attorneys for the plaintiffs on this case, who have been attempting to ascertain a proper to marriage for homosexual {couples} – has stated that this actually does give them the chance to evaluate legal guidelines towards homosexual marriage in these states which have them. I consider it is 31 states have handed bans on homosexual marriage.
CONAN: Thirty-eight, I believe.
ELVING: Effectively, the completely different…
CONAN: Completely different ranges of ban.
ELVING: …completely different definitions of what is a ban, however an outright ban in 31. And take a look at these, and put them towards the rules that have been laid out by the courtroom on this resolution yesterday and say, gee, this does not appear to move constitutional muster, in response to Justice Kennedy and his different 4 voters on the liberal aspect.
CONAN: And let’s get Bambi(ph) on the road, Bambi with us from Charleston.
BAMBI: Hello. Thanks a lot for taking my name on the air. So many issues within the information. I really like the present, will actually miss and want I had – weren’t so many necessary issues, so we might specific sentiments alongside these traces. However I did wish to increase the difficulty of the change in Voters Rights Act. As a born and raised Southerner, I’ve had the chance to reside everywhere in the United States, and thus I garnered my liberal tendencies.
I’ve to say that till these justices stand in a voting line in states resembling South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, they’re clearly clueless. I’ve seen voters denied directions on casting provisional ballots. I’ve seen African-American voters turned away and informed they need to drive to headquarters within the night – which is clearly closed – in different to get these provisional directions.
And I’ve stood ahead many occasions, given directions myself or reprimanded people who find themselves not permitting legitimate IDs. It is unreal, simply blows my thoughts. Till they stand in these traces and see black voters turned away, they’re clueless as to what is going on to occur with this new deal.
CONAN: Ron, it is fascinating: To return to the opinion there – and this was, once more, Chief Justice Roberts writing for almost all, saying it isn’t a query, in fact there’s nonetheless racial discrimination on voting. He stated that may be a reality. The opposite query, although, is whether or not the premise on which this regulation is being held – and he talked concerning the areas that had been chosen for enforcement, that had not been up to date for 40 years. And he stated that is merely not the case in the event you take a look at turnout figures, in the event you take a look at the variety of African-American and minority officers who’ve been elected.
ELVING: That is proper. There was change. No query that there was change. The query is: Does that imply that the mechanism by which a lot of that change has been achieved needs to be eliminated? Or does it imply that that mechanism needs to be, in some sense or one other, altered? What does it imply? If the change that now we have seen within the final 40 years is one thing that the courtroom approves and Congress approves – and Congress reauthorized this regulation again in 2006, unanimously within the Senate, and nearly unanimously within the Senate, 90 % of the Senate voted…
CONAN: Within the Home, you imply.
ELVING: Within the Home, they voted 90 % for this. So there does appear to be some approval of the change that is taken place, largely due to the Voting Rights Act. So does that imply that we must always not want the Voting Rights Act anymore, or does it imply that it is accomplished a very good job and it needs to be retained? That is, I believe, an argument that is going to go ahead.
The opposite query is: Is it honest to only take a look at the 9 states that have been completely below this explicit onus of getting to take all their voting legal guidelines to the Justice Division? Elements of a number of different states needed to do it, as properly. Is it honest to solely put them within the penalty field? Or would it not make extra sense to plot a broader formulation? Or probably simply say that every one 50 states must have their voting rights pre-cleared by some authority that retains the Structure of the US in thoughts?
CONAN: It was fascinating, additionally, to listen to John Lewis – in fact, the member of Congress from Georgia and the civil rights pioneer – to speak about what makes us suppose that rights given can’t be taken away, take a stroll in my sneakers. Bambi, thanks very a lot for the decision.
BAMBI: Thanks. I admire you addressing it.
CONAN: And a few emails on that topic. That is from Scott: At this time, I am unable to assist fascinated about the Supreme Court docket, which overturned key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 – unspeakably unhappy. And that is from Maroila(ph) – Mavoila(ph), excuse me. It’s wonderful to me the Supreme Court docket might really feel race is not necessary in voting points the identical week that TV meals icon Paula Deen is below a microscope for being a Southern belle who used racial slurs. How might there be such completely different views of the state of affairs?
We get the purpose. It isn’t fairly what the courtroom dominated, however we get the purpose. It is fascinating, Ron, as we go forward, it appears to me the courtroom has already determined it isn’t going to take up one other homosexual marriage case. It as we speak dominated there have been two potentialities on the docket, not subsequent yr.
ELVING: Not subsequent yr, though we might be affirmative motion once more subsequent yr due to a case coming from the state of Michigan. That may give the courtroom a chance to weigh in once more on a difficulty that it additionally dominated on this week, sending an affirmative motion plan from the state of Texas again right down to an appellate courtroom for one more evaluate.
There’s nonetheless some roiling on the courtroom with respect to their perspective in direction of affirmative motion.
CONAN: Ron Elving, as at all times, thanks very a lot.
ELVING: And Neal, let me simply say the moments I’ve spent talking with you in your present have been among the happiest moments of my working life.
CONAN: Thanks for that, Ron. We admire it.
ELVING: Going to overlook it.
CONAN: Senior Washington editor Ron Elving, right here with us in Studio 42. Once we come again, properly, we’ll examine in with two extra NPR reporters, however extra of your calls, as properly. What is the speak of the nation as we speak? 800-989-8255. Electronic mail us: speak@npr.org. Stick with us. I am Neal Conan. It is the TALK OF THE NATION, from NPR Information.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
CONAN: That is TALK OF THE NATION. I am Neal Conan. At this time, for the final time on this system, we’re doing – properly, we’re doing what we do. We’re speaking about you are speaking about round your dinner desk, within the automotive with the youngsters, as you stand in line on the grocery retailer or examine in on Twitter. Chances are you’ll not understand it, however you’ve got at all times helped set out agenda day by day. Once we replenish our planning board with the subjects we’ll cowl at 2 PM Jap Time, your voices rang in our ears.
So inform us, yet one more time, what is the speak of the nation? 800-989-8255. Electronic mail us: speak@npr.org. You may as well discover us on Twitter. That is @totn. And let’s go to Bob, Bob with us from Gainesville.
BOB: Thanks, Neal. I discover that the Edward Snowden case has definitely been the speak of the nation. However the underlying points behind this are very a lot fascinating to me and plenty of others, the thought as as to if or not – what the federal government is doing encroaching on our civil liberties and studying into our telephone traces and whatnot. Whether or not or not that’s accomplished within the identify of safety is a really fascinating dialogue.
I really feel that we must always not commerce our liberties for safety, and, in fact, the precedent for this was 9/11. Many may concern that we’d have one other 9/11 assault, and 9/11 being the falsified assault that it was, with Constructing Seven being a constructing 47 tales tall that fell in freefall pace in a matter of seconds, was not hit by some other airplane…
CONAN: Ah, I see now we have a truther with us.
BOB: Sure, properly I believe that is a really derogatory time period, and maybe in your final present…
CONAN: It is derogatory since you’re speaking scientific nonsense. I’ve to – I am sorry I’ve to upbraid you – I am sorry to upbraid you. I’m sorry to upbraid you. Please, I attempt to pay attention with respect to callers, besides after they have their info flat improper.
BOB: Do you suppose Constructing Seven just isn’t a really telling incident, sir?
CONAN: I believe it fell for various causes, and the scientific neighborhood agrees with me. Effectively, extra to the purpose, I agree with them. What do I learn about Constructing Seven? The actual fact is…
BOB: Effectively, truly, the architects and engineers all are in a consensus of…
CONAN: No they don’t seem to be, Bob, and I am sorry…
BOB: Sure, there is a group referred to as Architects and Engineers…
CONAN: Bob, I am hanging up on you, as a result of that is nonsense. Thanks. Let’s transfer proper alongside. Paula’s on the road with us from Tucson.
PAULA: Hello. I am glad to be on the air as we speak. We’ll miss you very a lot. Wendy Johnson is definitely one in every of my new heroines, however dwelling down right here close to the border, I wished to speak a bit bit about immigration.
CONAN: And also you’re proper on the frontline there.
PAULA: Proper on the frontline, and, , dwelling round and amongst many Mexican immigrants and immigrants from Latin America, you get a really completely different perspective than folks in different elements of the nation. One of many issues that has actually shocked me about this complete dialogue is nobody appears to see how backwards now we have it. Even our personal senators, McCain and a few of our representatives, appear to suppose that the very first thing it is advisable to is quote-unquote “safe the border,” when in truth, if we set up a guest-worker program, if we set up a means for folks to return right here legally, it erodes the very want for any kind of resistance to folks coming right here illegally
CONAN: I hear what you are saying, however there’s a facet of this wherein not less than some – and maybe I am studying between the traces right here – on the Republican aspect say with the intention to get Republican votes, now we have to have this aspect within the invoice, in any other case it isn’t going to get handed. And that necessary aspect that many progressives need, the trail to citizenship for the 11 million or so already right here, that is not going to go wherever.
PAULA: Effectively, I perceive that, and I – to me, that simply factors to the dysfunction of our system and the way in which we do management on this nation. To place 20,000 extra folks down right here the place our border patrol can barely preserve the wants that it has already, after which to construct a fence that, fairly frankly, , I do not suppose you possibly can construct a wall excessive sufficient to maintain determined folks out of this nation. And I believe it is time we realized that.
And we’re additionally – what occurs with the border fence? Moreover creating an environment of militarization and hostility and suspicion amongst folks, it’s destroying a whole lot of very important elements of our surroundings down right here. And it is a very delicate ecosystem within the Southwest.
So there are such a lot of causes to not go that path and so many causes to start out how we are able to begin welcoming folks into this nation who wish to be right here, who’re contributing, who wish to work. And I suppose my final level can be to all these well-meaning folks in my camp who level to the truth that Mexican laborers are keen to do jobs nobody else needs to do, why ought to an individual need to conform to do slave labor to be welcomed into this nice nation? So that is what I’ve to say. Thanks.
CONAN: Thanks very a lot for the decision, Paula. Marilyn Geewax, our senior enterprise editor for NPR, is right here. And we at all times love an opportunity to speak together with her. She joins us one final time in Studio 42. Good to have you ever with us, Marilyn.
MARILYN GEEWAX, BYLINE: Hello, Neal, it is nice to be with you.
CONAN: And this time final week, there was one thing akin to panic setting in, because it was Ben Bernanke saying, properly, perhaps by even the top of the yr, we’d have the ability to begin winding down that quantitative easing, cease shopping for so many bonds and wean the system off these injections of federal cash that we have been utilizing for therefore lengthy.
And abruptly, the bond market and the inventory market went (makes noises).
GEEWAX: And that large bomb is hitting on lots of people who’re attempting to purchase houses proper now. Rates of interest, the long-term charges, those that you simply use to purchase a house with, 30-year mortgages, they’ve actually risen rather a lot previously month. We have seen rates of interest on these residence mortgages go from about one thing within the vary of three and a – three-and-three-quarters of a % up, to about four-and-a-half %, even past that. Now it is beginning to appear to be it might stand up to five %.
So in the event you have been fascinated about shopping for a house, perhaps abruptly, understanding that your month-to-month mortgage cost goes to be $100 extra, perhaps $200 extra, that is actually inflicting lots of people to both rush into shopping for a house earlier than charges go even greater, or perhaps begin to change their thoughts and suppose perhaps renting some time longer is not such a foul concept.
So this subject of residence affordability is turning into a bit bit extra of an issue in any case this time with low rates of interest. So I believe that is actually been the large fallout from the upper rates of interest. Whether or not or not that is a short lived phenomenon, and perhaps it will simply kind of die down, but it surely might begin to derail a few of this housing restoration we have seen this yr.
CONAN: And fascinating, Mr. Bernanke made this announcement as a result of he stated, properly, , the financial system, it is getting higher. And I believe as we speak, we’re even seeing some encouraging employment numbers.
GEEWAX: Oh, it is at all times so difficult with the financial system, as a result of this is the factor: He is saying sure, the explanation rates of interest are going to begin to drift greater is as a result of the financial system is definitely getting stronger, and that is good. We might love a stronger financial system. However, , an enormous a part of the explanation why the financial system is getting stronger is as a result of the housing market has been gaining.
When folks purchase houses, additionally they get landscaping providers, and so they purchase furnishings, and so they do issues that create jobs for different folks. So how do you handle to begin to increase rates of interest to maintain the financial system on extra regular footing, to get charges again to one thing that appears extra traditionally in line? And that may be a little bit greater. 5 % is extra in keeping with what’s regular for mortgage charges.
But when the housing market will get weaker, and perhaps we begin to backslide once more, and the job progress that we have seen in building begins to ease off, will we get proper again into the soup? Will we slide again? You already know, Neal, it has been 4 years precisely. It was in June of 2009 that the financial system circled and started to develop after the large plunge for the recession.
So we have had 4 years of progress, but it surely’s nonetheless very weak, and a whole lot of it’s tied to that housing market coming again. So it is a precarious second.
CONAN: Are you inspired broadly concerning the U.S. financial system? Do you suppose that is – regular progress goes to have the ability to proceed?
GEEWAX: It is such a sophisticated time proper now. Once I look out throughout it, there are such a lot of issues which are so encouraging within the vitality sector, and my goodness, the brand new applied sciences that we’re popping out with, the brand new methods of producing, there are simply so many thrilling issues on the market, whether or not it is agricultural or simply issues which are popping out of the high-tech sector. There’s a lot to suppose, boy, that is – this could possibly be an actual turning level. The financial system may actually take off.
However then I look the opposite path, and there is nonetheless – we have nearly 12 million folks long-term unemployed, and the – is about half of that, nearly. So it is – we have lots of people in search of work and a whole lot of child boomers who misplaced earnings and misplaced wealth throughout this. Individuals are shifting in direction of retirement, a really massive cohort of People.
CONAN: I want you would not point out that.
GEEWAX: Yeah, proper about – one thing like 75, 78 million People are steaming in direction of retirement. And their houses are perhaps not again to the place they as soon as have been by way of the worth. Their retirement financial savings, after you modify for inflation, are nonetheless depressed. Lots of people misplaced jobs and took jobs for decrease pay. So you’ve got bought an enormous chunk of the inhabitants shifting in direction of retirement, not within the sort of form that that they had hoped to be in.
And you continue to have an terrible lot of individuals with no jobs in any respect, or underemployed, or these long-term unemployed people. It is – it stays a really uneven and really powerful financial system, and I really feel like I would not be shocked if two years from now, the financial system’s again in a foul recession. And I would not be shocked if two years from now, progress is 4 or 5 %. It, both means, appears completely believable to me.
CONAN: Marilyn Geewax, as at all times, thanks very a lot to your time as we speak. We actually do admire the time you’ve got spent with us.
GEEWAX: Oh, thanks, Neal. It is at all times simply been a pleasure and an honor to be with you.
CONAN: NPR’s senior enterprise editor Marilyn Geewax, with us right here in Studio 42. Here is a few emails. The congressional gridlock and animosity is my vote for necessary subject. That from Joyce. And that is from Corey(ph): I am trying ahead to the nation’s technique to speak about tax reform. It won’t be as fascinating as immigration reform, but it may be simply as necessary.
And that is from Victor Singing Eagle(ph): Here is one thing we needs to be speaking about, seeing how native points continuously get overshadowed by bigger points. I am undecided exactly what went down, however I learn that the Supreme Court docket made an necessary ruling on the ICWA, Indian Little one Welfare Act. Will help – someone assist me perceive, as I made – I’d exit in a limb. This was an adoption case the place a toddler was put up for adoption by an Indian lady. Her father had renounced any curiosity. The Indian lady put the kid up for adoption. She was adopted by a Caucasian couple, I believe, in North Carolina, after which her father put in his declare below the ICWA, the Indian Little one Welfare Act.
He was given custody. The adoptive dad and mom sued. Their case was upheld by the Supreme Court docket. They will now attempt to get their custody again. It bought despatched again to the courts in North Carolina. It isn’t sure that they may get custody, however as I perceive it, it was determined roughly on a technical foundation and never on a broad foundation. However I’ll stand corrected if I am improper. Within the meantime, let’s get Claudia on the road, Claudia with us from Denver.
CLAUDIA: Hello. Neal, to begin with, I wish to say that I believe that is one of the best present on NPR, and I’m going to overlook you a lot day by day.
CONAN: Thanks.
CLAUDIA: And also you’re simply a unprecedented host. So – however I used to be calling concerning the wildfires in Colorado, and, I imply, they’re simply devastating the state, and never solely this state, however every part round us. The wildfires have been induced, to such an excellent extent, by beetle kill, which is brought on by the truth that we’ve not had chilly sufficient winters to kill off the beetles.
CONAN: These are bark beetles, and as you counsel, in earlier durations, they have been killed off by excessive chilly throughout the wintertime. That chilly just isn’t as chilly because it was, and people beetles are killing massive swaths of timber, not simply in Colorado, however throughout the West.
CLAUDIA: That is completely true. And it is – I imply, this a part of the nation is so stunning and has so many beautiful ecosystems. And what we’re seeing is a lot being burned to the bottom. One of many different issues is that folks have determined to reside, for example, within the Black Forest space in Colorado Springs. They’ve determined to construct houses there. They actually do not perceive the setting right here, and they also do not do something to mitigate the possibility of fireplace. You already know, they hold all these big, previous timber round their houses…
CONAN: As a result of they’re stunning, however they’re additionally tinder.
CLAUDIA: Precisely.
CONAN: Claudia, I can see you are having a bit downside together with your throat, so we’ll allow you to go.
CLAUDIA: Sorry.
CONAN: Thanks very a lot for the type phrases, and thanks very a lot for the decision.
CLAUDIA: Thanks for the present. Bye.
CONAN: We’re speaking about, properly, what is the speak of the nation? That is TALK OF THE NATION, from NPR Information. And NPR science correspondent Richard Harris is with us. An ideal introduction, Richard.
RICHARD HARRIS, BYLINE: Hi there, Neal. Sure.
CONAN: And it’s on every week the place now we have seen the president of the US provide you with an bold coverage to scale back carbon emissions. That will, in flip, scale back, we hope, world warming, or not less than the pace at which the Earth is warming.
HARRIS: Sure. Even perhaps to a small extent. Clearly, it’s a world downside. And if the U.S. will get on board and could be very severe about it, it may make some distinction. However clearly, you want cooperation from world wide, as a result of we’re not the main wrongdoer in emissions of carbon dioxide, however we definitely produce nonetheless an enormous quantity of it, and we’re accountable for lots of the carbon dioxide that is within the air. So it was fascinating to see this kind of scattershot method that the president took to attempt to kind of say what – the place can I make an effort?
And it’s scattershot, as a result of the Congress has principally determined they are not going to behave on this. And so the president and his staff determined to say: Effectively, the place can we make a distinction with no need new legal guidelines, with no need Congress to be concerned? And so you find yourself with a kind of spectrum of concepts that he put out.
CONAN: And a whole lot of them concerned emissions from coal-fired crops, both new ones – and people rules, I believe, are actually accepted, and it is – as we hold listening to, it makes it nearly unattainable to construct a brand new coal-fired plant utilizing current know-how.
HARRIS: Proper. And people rules are nonetheless within the works. They have been proposed and introduced again – pulled again a bit bit, however he referred to as for them to maneuver ahead once more and be finalized later this yr, after which to use that very same normal to energy crops which are present…
CONAN: Current, yeah.
HARRIS: …energy crops. And that is a tough one, as a result of he did not specify how a lot they have to be reined in, but it surely’s extraordinarily tough, if not unattainable, typically, to take carbon dioxide from an influence plant and scale back it in any vital means. There are some actually soiled energy crops that you could possibly enhance considerably, however you possibly can’t make them as clear as pure fuel until you do one thing tremendously dramatic, like seize the carbon dioxide and bury it underground. And that is extraordinarily costly, additionally.
CONAN: After which there was the point out of the Keystone XL pipeline, which lots of people did not anticipate. He stated we’re not going to approve this until it proves to not have a big impact on carbon emissions. And a few folks say, properly, it will depend on the way you take a look at it.
HARRIS: Completely. That is going to be a really fascinating dialogue, as a result of that – it was – the phrases have been ambiguous, and, in fact, the Canadians instantly argued, oh, properly, this isn’t going to considerably exacerbate local weather change. People who find themselves against the pipeline stated: What are you speaking about? You would be tapping into this big useful resource of fossil fuels that basically ought to remain underground without end. And in the event you begin – in the event you discover a method to deliver it to the market, you will inevitably going to have an effect on local weather change. In order that’s going to be very fascinating to see how that rhetorical twist will get – performs out within the coming weeks and months.
CONAN: It is so fascinating. Richard, thanks for being with us. Typically, now we have Richard when there’s some actual catastrophe happening on the planet to elucidate to us concerning the oil leaks within the Gulf of Mexico and such issues. And that is solely a slow-motion disaster, solely a slow-motion practice wreck. So it is at all times good to have you ever on this system.
HARRIS: It is at all times a pleasure, Neal.
CONAN: Let’s examine, yet one more electronic mail, this from Alicia in Madisonville, Kentucky: I’ve heard NPR speak about elevating minimal wage and the consequences that may make. I, together with so a lot of my friends, are working in minimal wage or barely above minimal wage jobs. We’ve bachelor levels, or greater. We’re having such issue discovering full-time work the place we are able to make a dwelling. Most of us need to take out scholar loans to get this training. Now we’re unable to pay it again. What are we to do?
And this from Darren(ph): I am unable to consider the starvation strike in Guantanamo Bay has been happening since February. Nearly all of People do not appear to know or care that most of the folks we’re detaining have been cleared of any wrongdoing, but are being held indefinitely. The current use of metal-tip feeding tubes for putting detainees to demoralize them makes me ashamed of my nation and my president.
There are such a lot of individuals who wrote. There are such a lot of we referred to as. I am sorry we’re not going to have the ability to get to extra of your calls as we speak. And thanks a lot for carrying sufficient to contact us. Once we come again after a brief break, we will be speaking with David Ellis Dickerson from Greeting Card Emergency, so electronic mail us. What’s one of the best goodbye card you ever bought? That is at speak@npr.org, or give us a name: 800-989-8255. Stick with us. I am Neal Conan. It is the TALK OF THE NATION, from NPR Information.
Copyright © 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might range. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.