To submit a letter to The Age, e-mail letters@theage.com.au. Please embrace your own home tackle and phone quantity. No attachments, please embrace your letter within the physique of the e-mail. See right here for our guidelines and recommendations on getting your letter printed.
Nature’s bounty
I fully agree along with your correspondent that we should take into account youthful generations when planning high-rise developments (Letters, 13/11). Prioritising their bodily and psychological well being means putting local weather and environmental issues on the centre of city design.
As mentioned within the article ″Docs eager to prescribe contemporary air and nature″ (9/11), common entry to nature and open area is important. As a result of high-density initiatives inevitably clear present timber and gardens, builders should actively exchange this greenery inside their designs.
Eradicating tree canopies, biodiverse gardens, and permeable floor surfaces will solely worsen the city warmth island impact, drive up carbon emissions, and enhance flood dangers.
If we wish to improve the lives of youthful generations, we should guarantee their future residing environments are resilient, and secure.
Jennie Epstein, Little River
Inconceivable process
The Liberal Occasion Sussan Ley led for a short while was by no means going to create the world she now appears to yearn for (″Empathy, democracy’s greatest menace″, 14/11).
Judy Kevill, Ringwood
Political discourse
Sussan Ley succinctly summarises the miserable state of political discourse each right here and within the US. She captures the rising apathy and disillusionment of the typical voter with our political class. The one factor that she fails to acknowledge is that she was a part of the issue.
Ross Hudson, Mount Martha
Vote for future
The most recent polls predict there shall be a complete wipeout of Labor in Victoria.
Any acknowledgement of the vary of achievements by Labor over the previous 12 years are ignored, together with the huge variety of infrastructure initiatives overtaken by scandals and the extent of corruption within the unions related to the Huge Construct program aimed on the development of Melbourne over the following 30 years.
The rising prices on these initiatives is disturbing as reported that authorities ministers had been reluctant or ignored corruption recommendation when instructed by their departmental heads.
It’s a undeniable fact that any authorities can run out of steam whereas oppositions can supply all kinds of inducements to voters with out proof or expertise.
We the voters have to assess Victoria’s present challenges and vote in the most effective pursuits of the state’s future not merely on outrage, ideology, anger and failure however on the idea of better consideration to integrity oversight and regulation and take the politicians out of infrastructure decision-making as soon as applications have been authorized. This is applicable additionally to unions and enterprise and company elites. Regulators should be put in place to make sure any infrastructure challenge is accomplished in response to sound economics.
Ray Cleary, Camberwell
The Lasso method?
What a large number the sandpapergate saga has change into. Sadly, many appear to be taking sides. Maybe, we’d do higher to undertake the Ted Lasso method: be curious however not judgmental.
Terry Kelly, Coburg
Present Treaty respect
I’m more and more annoyed at Jess Wilson’s response to questions on her determination to repeal the Treaty Act handed by the Victorian Parliament precisely a yr in the past. She equates the Act with the Voice Referendum and states that Victorians gave a really clear message. The precise lead to Victoria was 54 per cent No and 46 per cent Sure. A big cohort – round 15 per cent of No voters cited fears centred on the modification of the Structure as the principle cause for his or her determination. The Treaty doesn’t contain any constitutional change and it doesn’t preclude any present or future First Nations applications. It’s merely a method of exhibiting respect for our Indigenous heritage and a step in the direction of change and better alternatives for our First Nations folks.
Judy Nicol, Sandhurst
Acknowledge historical past
Your correspondent appropriately asserts that Jess Wilson, if elected, has an ″simple mandate″ to repeal Victoria’s First Peoples Treaty (Letters, 13/11). What I take challenge with, nevertheless, is their declare that due to the No vote within the 2023 Voice referendum, the Treaty ″ought to by no means have been introduced earlier than parliament″.
The Treaty-making course of started in 2016, in different phrases, a decade-long dedication to advance justice and self-determination for First Peoples.
Whereas the referendum was a mannequin not tried and examined, Victoria was implementing one thing that had existed efficiently for the First Peoples’ Meeting for the previous six years.
The Treaty is (or was) a chance for all Victorians to acknowledge our shared historical past and transfer forwards collectively.
Neil Hudson, East Melbourne
Kew right here for doubt
The profile of the Opposition Chief Jess Wilson (″How a daggy Millennial got here to carry a celebration’s hope in her palms″, 13/11) overlooks one essential element: Kew is a marginal seat.
Wilson holds it by round 4 per cent, and former Boroondara mayor Sophie Torney is standing once more as an impartial. If the Coalition wins authorities however Wilson loses Kew, who turns into premier? Would the insurance policies change? Voters throughout Victoria may wish to take into account this earlier than they solid their vote.
Amy Hiller, Kew
Give Treaty a go
The article on Jess Wilson coated many affordable questions on her beliefs and method to politics. Sadly, an essential topic to many Victorians was by no means broached: Treaty. Why is Wilson lifeless set on eradicating Treaty? Why would it not not be fairer to at the least give Treaty an opportunity to show its worth over an inexpensive timeframe, to comply with Treaty for a yr at the least? Please, give Treaty a good go.
Lynn Heath, Doncaster
Counting the coast
The 2 medically certified correspondents (Letters, 13/11) commented that the deinstitutionalisation of Victoria’s psychological well being providers within the Nineteen Eighties was, in itself, a good suggestion. Nevertheless the equal assets had been subsequently by no means allotted into group psychological well being providers and we proceed to see the social penalties at this time.
There is a chance value in not correctly funding psychological well being care and that’s discovered within the information on daily basis in experiences of homelessness, crime and home violence. The one conclusion one can attain is that the bureaucrats and politicians who went down this path believed that society ought to bear the social value of the cynical funding priorities that they foisted upon us.
David Fry, Windsor
Debt advantages
So Labor has notched up insufferable ranges of debt, at about 30 per cent of the state’s GDP. Debt underneath the Liberals reached 58 per cent when Henry Bolte was premier. And in each cases the expenditure was on a lot wanted infrastructure – faculties, hospitals, roads, public transport.
John Andrews, North Fitzroy
AI’s failure
Latest developments have made it clear that the place human relationships are involved, synthetic intelligence doesn’t have all of the solutions.
Melanie Carter, Semaphore, SA
Exterminate!
Your correspondent (Letters, 13/11) requires AI to be requested attain world peace, finish poverty and remedy local weather change. AI’s apparent reply could be to take away the human race. Then there could be no one left to care about Essendon’s AFL flag prospects.
Phil Bodel, Ocean Grove