WHO DECIDES WHETHER THEY RECEIVE PROTECTION?
The unification minister usually determines whether or not a North Korean arrival qualifies for defense, though the NIS director could make the choice on nationwide safety grounds.
Yu informed Reuters the sensitivity of the case may additionally hold them out of public view longer than different North Korean arrivals.
Their bodily and psychological situation can be more likely to be assessed.
Yu stated when he met them they have been being held individually at a Ukrainian detention facility and the extended isolation and uncertainty might have affected their psychological well being.
DID UKRAINE HAVE THE RIGHT TO TRANSFER THEM?
The Third Geneva Conference requires prisoners of conflict to be launched and repatriated at once after energetic hostilities finish. That doesn’t essentially prohibit earlier launch or switch to a 3rd nation.
South Korea and Ukraine haven’t disclosed the authorized foundation for his or her switch, together with whether or not it formally ends the troopers’ POW standing.
Peter Ward, a analysis fellow on the Sejong Institute, stated repatriation was a primary precept governing prisoners of conflict (POWs) however shouldn’t apply the place it may injury their welfare or human rights.
“There may be ample foundation beneath humanitarian and human rights legislation for these POWs to be transferred to a 3rd nation of their selection as long as that third nation of their selection is ready to take them,” Ward stated.
Lee Shin-wha, a Korea College professor and former envoy for North Korean human rights, stated the switch may nonetheless generate authorized and diplomatic friction as a result of worldwide legislation treats North Korea as a separate state, whereas South Korea considers North Koreans as its residents.
Their said want to come to the South and the dangers they might face within the North present grounds for accepting them, she stated.